Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-15-2021, 12:24 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,865,154 times
Reputation: 10371

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by katygirl68 View Post
Are you really in Texas? Surely you know by now that this woman is not going to be charged. People believe they have a right to protect life and property. This is clearly such a case.
Are you really thinking this through? Show proof her life was in danger from a man who was unarmed and not trying to break in. This is clearly not the case.

Now if more info showed he was armed or trying to break in then you'd have something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-15-2021, 02:57 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,173 posts, read 26,197,836 times
Reputation: 27914
Quote:
Originally Posted by DK736 View Post
Not if Texas has castle laws like Florida does. I have a friend in Florida who shot a loser trying to break into his car right from his front steps a few years back. Got him right in the leg right when he realized my friend caught him in the act. The thug took him to court, tried to sue, and even played the race card. Case was dropped for castle laws.
Even using that as an example, "trying to break into his car"...he wasn't just standing there looking through the window
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2021, 03:02 AM
 
21,475 posts, read 10,575,891 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Are you really thinking this through? Show proof her life was in danger from a man who was unarmed and not trying to break in. This is clearly not the case.

Now if more info showed he was armed or trying to break in then you'd have something.
I’m saying the prosecutors will likely not charge her unless it’s obvious she targeted someone and tried to pretend he was a peeping Tom. I have nothing to go by except the brief description that he was a peeping Tom looking at her through her window. I’m not sure why they even called him that unless the guy has a history of doing that. They sure didn’t share it with us in the news story linked here.

All I know is that Texas grand juries tend not to indict people in cases like these.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2021, 03:26 PM
 
20,757 posts, read 8,579,752 times
Reputation: 14393
Here's how to discourage peeping Toms:


Close the curtains
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2021, 05:18 PM
 
Location: NW Nevada
18,160 posts, read 15,628,539 times
Reputation: 17150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Are you really thinking this through? Show proof her life was in danger from a man who was unarmed and not trying to break in. This is clearly not the case.

Now if more info showed he was armed or trying to break in then you'd have something.
Ummm, in all Honesty the only thing "clear" in this case is that nothing is clear. To many unknowns to even attempt to make a call. It sounds funky with a lot of the factors in play number one being why it is this guy stood there while she got a rifle into play. Getting a rifle up and into use is hardly an action that could be called subtle. That sounds petty weird to me. I'm no greenhorn when it comes to firearms and even with all I have skill wise there I could not conceal it if I was putting a rifle into action.

But I wasn't there, I have no idea of the exact circumstances that made this guy stand there and present a target I have no idea what type of rifle she was using, the range involved how she had the weapon stored I know nothing other than it seems she shot the guy dead. As I said earlier there is no more dangerous animal on Earth than a frightened woman with a firearm and a woman living alone which I assume she is sees some guy peering in her bedroom window I'm going to say yeah...she was scared.

Unless there is something else at play like she set up an ex or some such I'm not going to call unjustified out of hand. All we "clearly" know at this point is he was outside peering in her window at the wee hours and she shot him dead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2021, 06:32 PM
 
19,719 posts, read 10,124,301 times
Reputation: 13089
Quote:
Originally Posted by NVplumber View Post
Ummm, in all Honesty the only thing "clear" in this case is that nothing is clear. To many unknowns to even attempt to make a call. It sounds funky with a lot of the factors in play number one being why it is this guy stood there while she got a rifle into play. Getting a rifle up and into use is hardly an action that could be called subtle. That sounds petty weird to me. I'm no greenhorn when it comes to firearms and even with all I have skill wise there I could not conceal it if I was putting a rifle into action.

But I wasn't there, I have no idea of the exact circumstances that made this guy stand there and present a target I have no idea what type of rifle she was using, the range involved how she had the weapon stored I know nothing other than it seems she shot the guy dead. As I said earlier there is no more dangerous animal on Earth than a frightened woman with a firearm and a woman living alone which I assume she is sees some guy peering in her bedroom window I'm going to say yeah...she was scared.

Unless there is something else at play like she set up an ex or some such I'm not going to call unjustified out of hand. All we "clearly" know at this point is he was outside peering in her window at the wee hours and she shot him dead.
If she was scared for her life, that is all it takes under castle doctrine. But I am prejudiced, I won't cry over the death of any pervert.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2021, 08:55 PM
 
4,329 posts, read 7,235,823 times
Reputation: 3488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floorist View Post
If she was scared for her life, that is all it takes under castle doctrine.
See my previous post #167. Castle Doctrine does not appear to apply to this case, as the person shot was outside the habitation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2021, 09:25 PM
 
19,719 posts, read 10,124,301 times
Reputation: 13089
Quote:
Originally Posted by ged_782 View Post
See my previous post #167. Castle Doctrine does not appear to apply to this case, as the person shot was outside the habitation.
I think you are wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2021, 09:38 PM
 
Location: alexandria, VA
16,352 posts, read 8,095,474 times
Reputation: 9726
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floorist View Post
I think you are wrong.
Read the link in ged_782's post. I quoted from it in the next post. Here it is again (with the key section in boldface).

[I]For example, if you are sitting in your living room and see an individual peering in your window, you will probably not be justified under Texas law in using deadly force against the suspicious person. However, if the same fellow breaks a window and climbs through, you will be legally justified in using deadly force under Texas Penal Code §9.32. If you see the same individual scoping out your detached barn, you will not fall under Texas Penal Code §9.32, because it is not considered an occupied habitation. Note under our examples you may very well be justified under another section of the law in the use of deadly force, but not under Texas Penal Code §9.32, or what the media calls the “Castle Doctrine.”[/i]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2021, 10:14 PM
 
8,085 posts, read 5,249,640 times
Reputation: 22685
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floorist View Post
If she was scared for her life, that is all it takes under castle doctrine. But I am prejudiced, I won't cry over the death of any pervert.
+1. Good riddance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top