Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is how it should be here, and everywhere, for sure...
Quote:
Brazilian President Bolsonaro tells
@pfizer
that he is not going to encourage or mandate anything as long as Pfizer does not take responsibility for the possible side effects of the shots.
I wonder if Biden's mandate would void the waiver people signed against the vaccine manufacturers. You had to sign "I willingly assume the risks..." But can you be willing if you were forced?
The point is Pfizer is not and at no time was I mislead.
What? Is that even a complete thought?
For clarification in the title OP left out the word 'possible' in relation to side effects, making it a statement of fact there are side effects - rather then speculation there is.
Words have meanings man. It changed the context of the statement.
I see a moderator has now corrected the thread title.
Also adding his approval by his own people on how he's handled C19 isn't exactly positive.
Should Pfizer and other pharmaceutical concerns be held responsible when their products cause harm?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.