Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-16-2021, 02:43 PM
 
78,404 posts, read 60,579,949 times
Reputation: 49687

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohioaninsc View Post
The court has become to partisan...it's to the point where everyone knows exactly how the court will rule on any given issue...that's not good.
John Roberts is the only one that occasionally doesn't rule based on his political beliefs.
Here is the actual voting list, I'd suggest that there may be some perception bias going on and that the court is less political than the outside observers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_t..._United_States

Numerous, numerous cases where the alleged political lines are crossed up.

A huge number of cases ended up 8-1 or 9-0.

 
Old 09-16-2021, 06:46 PM
 
Location: USA
31,033 posts, read 22,070,533 times
Reputation: 19080
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Mitch McConnell and Trump had a lot to do with this.

Within hours of Scalia’s death, McConnell made clear no Obama appointment would get a confirmation hearing just 9 months before an election. Yet he changed his mind about confirmation hearing after RGB’s death, less than 2 months before election.

The ridiculous confirmation hearing of Kavenaugh was political theatre payback.

Trump campaigned on his ability to appoint conservative justices.
Sorry no Obama NOI members or Robert Byrd types in the court
 
Old 09-16-2021, 08:00 PM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,532,093 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
You from Zimbabwe or somewhere similar... ?? Your supposition is absolutely nuts.
Clarence Thomas criticizes judges for veering into politics

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on Thursday criticized some in the judiciary for veering into the role of legislators and politicians, saying it is not the role of judges to make policy or to base decisions on their personal feelings or religious beliefs.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/cl...?siteid=yhoof2
 
Old 09-17-2021, 07:58 AM
 
20,459 posts, read 12,379,585 times
Reputation: 10253
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
It's not a lie. The SC is very far right wing compared to the majority of the country.
it is a lie. it was not packed. "Packed " means something.

What the court is, is a reflection of the electorate when the electorate elected presidents who nominated and had Senate ratification of Justices as seats became open.


It is a balled faced lie, designed to push the ignorant. This is about justifying actual PACKING the court where democrats create new seats so they can fill them with crazy leftists.


so it IS IN FACT A LIE TO SAY THE COURT HAS BEEN PACKED.
 
Old 09-17-2021, 08:03 AM
 
20,459 posts, read 12,379,585 times
Reputation: 10253
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Mitch McConnell and Trump had a lot to do with this.

Within hours of Scalia’s death, McConnell made clear no Obama appointment would get a confirmation hearing just 9 months before an election. Yet he changed his mind about confirmation hearing after RGB’s death, less than 2 months before election.

The ridiculous confirmation hearing of Kavenaugh was political theatre payback.

Trump campaigned on his ability to appoint conservative justices.
What McConnell did was purely and utterly proper "Advice and Consent".

That is the role of the Senate. McConnell was the LEADER. Which means his party was in power in the Senate and by virtue of that situation, had the power to stop a president from filling an open seat. If the American people had wanted Obama to fill that seat, they would not have pushed the Senate to the right. Had there been confidence in Obama, the Senate would NOT have gone from a Super Majority Democrat, to a Majority Republican.


Blame Obama and his over reach for the the make up of the senate when Scalia died. Furthermore, had the democrats been in power in the Senate when RGB died, they would have held that seat hope. In PURELY CONSTITUTIONAL AUTORITY. But they weren't in power because the American people didn't want them making decisions like that.
 
Old 09-17-2021, 08:11 AM
 
28,122 posts, read 12,594,254 times
Reputation: 15336
I dont trust the Supreme Court to be impartial for the following reasons...


1. Court justices salaries, retirement, are paid by the Govt, (they are Govt employees).


2. The Supreme Court itself is on 'Govt property' and is considered a 'Govt' building.


3. Presidents nominate justices and 'govt' confirms them.


These are all VERY serious conflicts of interest (in the Govts favor)
 
Old 09-17-2021, 08:54 AM
 
9,504 posts, read 4,340,821 times
Reputation: 10556
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
The Supreme Court’s job approval has sunk to an all-time low, according to new polling taken after the court declined to block a deeply divisive Texas law banning most abortions.

Only 37 percent of registered voters said they approve of the court’s handling of its job, with 50 percent expressing disapproval in a survey released Wednesday by Quinnipiac University, which has tracked the Supreme Court’s job approval since 2004. A little more than a year ago, the polling firm reported what was basically an inverse result: 52 percent of registered voters said they approved of the way the court was handling its job, 37 percent disapproved.

https://thehill.com/regulation/court...low-poll-shows

This is the result of packing the court with justices who represent the far right minority of the electorate instead of the majority.

You don't know what "court packing" means.
 
Old 09-17-2021, 09:10 AM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,439,510 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by YourWakeUpCall View Post
You don't know what "court packing" means.
Well, if Texas' ignorant Fetal Heartbeat Bill or other similar legislation results in Roe v Wade being overturned, we will all soon find out exactly what it looks like.
 
Old 09-17-2021, 10:17 AM
 
19,718 posts, read 10,121,382 times
Reputation: 13081
The court leaves too many issues hanging. They need to settle some things instead of refusing to hear cases and letting things be settled by doing nothing.
 
Old 09-17-2021, 10:28 AM
 
Location: The house I built
574 posts, read 376,948 times
Reputation: 1306
Having supreme court justices trying to say the court is not political hacks sort of proves they are political hacks.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top