Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Because there is no federal statute nor Constitutional provision for doing so. Pretty simple.
The Constitution is extremely explicit in detailing how a sitting President can be removed from office. It is equally explicit in how one gets elected and sworn-in to that same office.
If biden was installed by election fraud, he was never a legitimate president in the first place.
If biden was installed by election fraud, he was never a legitimate president in the first place.
once congress confirms the votes he is president. if it is discovered later that he achieved office wrongly it does not change that fact. this is all covered in the de facto officer doctrine ( which i've pointed out to you multiple times ).
What I want to know is why so many of you are against or fear the results of this audit.
I am against the audit because it is unnecessary, expensive, and divisive.
I do not fear the results. After 10 months of time, the right wing has not been able to come up with any evidence of election malfeasance at all. This will not change it either, it will just give the right wing media something else to misrepresent and complain about
If biden was installed by election fraud, he was never a legitimate president in the first place.
The Constitution says otherwise. The states held elections and named their electors. The electors voted. Congress certified the electoral vote. Biden was sworn-in. The end.
once congress confirms the votes he is president. if it is discovered later that he achieved office wrongly it does not change that fact. this is all covered in the de facto officer doctrine ( which i've pointed out to you multiple times ).
If biden was installed by election fraud, he was never a legitimate president in the first place.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball
once congress confirms the votes he is president. if it is discovered later that he achieved office wrongly it does not change that fact. this is all covered in the de facto officer doctrine ( which i've pointed out to you multiple times ).
You forget that Artisan works under a slightly different constitution than the one that governs this country. his constitution has a "mulligan" clause, so he gets to call a do-over if he does not like the result.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
