Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I have no idea what will come of ithis but it's incomparable with the birth certificate thing. Sorry but that's just a dumb analogy. You're really reaching in order to find something to discredit it with. Which is dumb, because the simple fact that it's been going on for years with a single indictment thus far is enough of a basis for criticism, but that's not good enough. You have to find something else, even if it looks silly when you say it.
Sorry, to say it's not like the birthers is a dumb comment. It's a perfect analogy. You're really reaching because you want somehting to be true. All we heard from the birthers was the evidence is right around the corner. Same with these publicity seeking hounds.
Where is the proof? None except to say the voting patterns from state to state are similar.
These clowns have no more credibility than the boy who cried wolf. Media driven garbage so far, just like BLM. Sounds good but when you look at the facts it all falls apart.
I read the first couple paragraphs, and I have no idea what they're talking about, at all. Durham? DS?
Sussman Indictment:
Quote:
As alleged in the indictment, on Sept. 19, 2016, Sussman, a lawyer at a large international law firm, met with the FBI General Counsel at FBI Headquarters in Washington, D.C. Sussmann had requested the meeting to provide the General Counsel with certain data files and “white papers” that allegedly demonstrated a covert communications channel between the Trump Organization and a Russia-based bank. Sussmann, who had previously represented the Democratic National Committee in connection with a cyber hack, falsely stated to the General Counsel that he was not bringing these allegations to the FBI on behalf of any client. This false representation led the General Counsel to understand that Sussmann was providing information as a good citizen rather than a paid advocate or political operative. In fact, Sussmann assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two clients, including a U.S. technology executive and the Clinton Presidential Campaign.
It is alleged that beginning in July 2016, Sussmann worked with the aforementioned U.S. technology executive, other cyber researchers, and a U.S.-based investigative firm to assemble the data and white papers that Sussmann ultimately provided to the FBI and the media. The technology executive, for his part, exploited his access to non-public data at multiple internet companies and enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract designed to identify the perpetrators of malicious cyber-attacks and protect U.S. national security. The indictment further alleges that researchers were tasked to mine this internet data to establish “an inference” and “narrative” that would tie then-presidential candidate Donald Trump to Russia, and which the executive believed would please certain “VIPs.” The indictment also alleges that Sussmann, his law firm, and the technology executive coordinated with representatives and agents of the Clinton Campaign in these efforts.
The most important part:
Quote:
The Special Counsel’s investigation is ongoing.
We're only hearing about it because of the statue of limitations. Even then, the left media went ape s$%t because it specifically speaks in the indictment about their tricks:
Quote:
Let[']s for a moment think of the best case scenario, where we are able
to show (somehow) that DNS [] communication exists between Trump
and R[ussia]. How do we plan to defend against the criticism that
this is not spoofed [I traffic we are observing? There is no answer to
that. Let's assume again that they are not smart enough to refute our
"best case" scenario. [Tech Executive-I], you do realize that we will
have to expose every trick we have in our bag to even make a very
weak association?
LOL. Hardly. Facts? Many folks will ignore them, or simply deluge you with such a volume of nonsense that people give up. And then others repeat those lies, often with youtube videos that have no basis in actual facts.
Durham? Reading the lawsuit....its desperate to find SOMETHING. As the Lawyers for him said:
"At its core, the Special Counsel is bringing a false statement charge based on an oral statement allegedly made five years ago to a single witness that is unrecorded and unobserved by anyone else. The Department of Justice would ordinarily never bring such a baseless case."
We're only hearing about it because of the statue of limitations. Even then, the left media went ape s$%t because it specifically speaks in the indictment about their tricks:
Durham has now released the first indictment, this sets the stage for everything, the first arrest will confirm the future direction. Buckle up its going to be a bumpy ride. The patriots are now on the offensive and the Deepstate are the hunted, Durham is on the prowl.
But if you listen to advanced conspiracy nut Mike Adams, he says Democrats are going to go all out in making big events to distract the public from all that. You are a deeply devoted of Mike Adams, aren't you? And even take him seriously, don't you?
Last edited by StillwaterTownie; 09-20-2021 at 10:07 PM..
But if you listen to advanced conspiracy nut Mike Adams, he says Democrats are going to go all out in making big events to distract the public from all that.
Isn’t that happening now?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
