|
09-22-2021, 10:21 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: Connecticut
3,731 posts, read 1,090,495 times
Reputation: 3485
|
|
|
"The panel of scientists debated whether the data supports a widespread deployment of a third injection when evidence shows that fully vaccinated patients still have protection from severe illness and hospitalization.
“It’s unclear that everyone needs to be boosted, other than a subset of the population that clearly would be at high risk for serious disease,” committee member and NIH official Dr. Michael G. Kurilla affirmed.
Several of the panel’s members have argued there is no reliable data to support boosters."
Looks like this booster won't be a "one size fits all!" Sorry to Dicator Joe and Lord Fauci!
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/med...-up/ar-AAOyWhw
|
|
09-22-2021, 10:25 AM
|
|
|
|
1,958 posts, read 644,008 times
Reputation: 2636
|
|
|
Big pharma is going to have to up their campaign contributions to get another booster approved. LOL
|
|
09-22-2021, 02:39 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Connecticut
3,731 posts, read 1,090,495 times
Reputation: 3485
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raider Scott
Big pharma is going to have to up their campaign contributions to get another booster approved. LOL
|
Yup, gotta keep all those new billionaires this vaccine created nice and fat and happy! |
|
09-24-2021, 09:44 AM
|
|
|
|
24,203 posts, read 11,527,907 times
Reputation: 18008
|
|
The cdc director rejected the panel’s conclusion and is endorsing boosters for younger people.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cdc...t-risk-workers
Quote:
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky late Thursday endorsed the Pfizer coronavirus vaccine booster shot for younger at-risk workers, which is seen as a rare break from the agency's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices panel.
The panel had recommended the booster for Americans 65 and older and for those over 50 with underlying medical conditions, but voted against the younger at-risk worker recommendation.
Walensky put it back in, saying it aligns with a U.S. Food and Drug Administration booster authorization from earlier this week.
|
Political science. |
|
09-24-2021, 05:43 PM
|
|
|
|
17,665 posts, read 13,952,895 times
Reputation: 14900
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri
|
When you have two conflicting, non-binding scientific panel recommendations, that doesn't mean a deviation is "political". The panels were only advisory panels. |
|
09-24-2021, 05:45 PM
|
|
|
|
3,551 posts, read 1,453,088 times
Reputation: 7672
|
|
|
Follow the scie....dollars.
|
|
09-24-2021, 05:51 PM
|
|
|
|
43,586 posts, read 21,006,206 times
Reputation: 14717
|
|
|
I suspect they aren't inclined to allow us all to get the booster because they are still trying to get some people to get the first two jabs.
Sad state of affairs.
|
|
09-24-2021, 05:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: west central Georgia
2,203 posts, read 1,293,378 times
Reputation: 884
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trekker99
Follow the scie....dollars.
|
Brilliant  |
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
