Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
More than 62 million abortions have been performed since Roe vs. Wade. Abortion is really a form of population control.
It is simply a way to prevent millions of undesirable children, largely minorities, to be born into society.
Contraception can be used as a eugenic tool
Contraception is often misused in mass population control programmes in a racist way
Mass population control programmes can be a form of cultural imperialism or a misuse of power
Contraception may lead to depopulation
Contraception can be used as a eugenic tool
Contraception is often misused in mass population control programmes in a racist way
Mass population control programmes can be a form of cultural imperialism or a misuse of power
Contraception may lead to depopulation
given that it's pretty apparent that the fundamental motivation for most of the anti-choice crowd is more about punishing women for being sexually active, I'm sure they'd be just fine with banning contraception as well. Since with their fake world view that they mistakenly want to think is science, they can't really allow that either. But as long as they can pretend they have the authority to claim the right to control women and their bodies, they're good.
Why not just call a spade a spade? Anyway the guilt from accepting the reality might just save a few more humans.
Pregnant women won't die by not getting an abortion, but a person does die when it's performed.
The reality is that we are creating more people into poverty. We have no actual plan when these kids are born, like guaranteed education and healthcare for all of them. Instead we just leave them to defend for themselves after they are born.
So they aren’t human until they exit the vagina canal?
I didn't claim that at all. I didn't say a single thing regarding when the fertilized egg has grown sufficiently for me to consider it an actual human.
By the way, it's vaginal canal.
I do believe a fetus is worthy of protection (and what I would call human) at some point well before exiting the vaginal canal. But it is not a legally recognized human until birth. A pregnant woman cannot claim her fetus as a dependent for tax purposes; if stillborn, no birth certificate is given; insurance policy cannot be taken out on a fetus; unborn are not counted in the census, etc.
The reality is that we are creating more people into poverty. We have no actual plan when these kids are born, like guaranteed education and healthcare for all of them. Instead we just leave them to defend for themselves after they are born.
So we need abortion to reduce the number of people in poverty? Really? We've aborted more than a million babies a year for the past fifty years. 62 million by some counts. Do you really think there would be 62 million more people living on poverty?
LBJ's war on poverty has done a fine job of expanding the number of people in poverty. All abortion has done is eliminate any chance its victims had to breathe.
Biden and his federal vaccine mandates beg to differ. Democratic governors and their “no vaccine no dining” also beg to differ.
“My body my choice” either applies to everything or nothing.
No vaccine no dining? Are you saying that unvaccinated aren't allowed to eat anymore? Or are they not allowed to eat out in a restaurant? Because if that's your point, then understand, eating in a restaurant is not a right, it's a privilege, and the pandemic isn't the start of that. Ever notice those signs out in some restaurants, We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone??
You aren't going to be forced to vaccinate - but you can't force those of us who are vaccinated to tolerate your presence and be exposed to your potentially infected presence. Just as you can't force people to think and believe as you do about women's reproductive rights. It's quite simple really.
So we need abortion to reduce the number of people in poverty? Really? We've aborted more than a million babies a year for the past fifty years. 62 million by some counts. Do you really think there would be 62 million more people living on poverty?
LBJ's war on poverty has done a fine job of expanding the number of people in poverty. All abortion has done is eliminate any chance its victims had to breathe.
I didn't say that. But maybe you have a solution when they are born.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
