Project Veritas Part 4 : Pfizer Scientists: ‘Your COVID Antibodies Are Better Than The [Pfizer] Vaccination (controversial, death)

[redguard57]

Originally Posted by GoldenPineTree

The mandates don't make an exception for people with natural immunity. This is unheard of anywhere else around the world.

This is an article from the British Medical Journal:



https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2101

Negative tests should suffice. If it were me I'd allow a longer interval in between negative tests if that person has proof of a prior covid diagnosis.

[GoldenPineTree]

Originally Posted by redguard57

Negative tests should suffice. If it were me I'd allow a longer interval in between negative tests if that person has proof of a prior covid diagnosis.

why should someone who recovered from COVID do regularly testing and someone vaccinated, no?

Israel found that if you recovered from COVID you were 13x less likely to catch it again than a vaccinated individual who never had COVID before.

[redguard57]

Originally Posted by GoldenPineTree

why should someone who recovered from COVID do regularly testing and someone vaccinated, no?

Israel found that if you recovered from COVID you were 13x less likely to catch it again than a vaccinated individual who never had COVID before.

Because we need some kind of proof.

[GoldenPineTree]

Originally Posted by redguard57

Because we need some kind of proof.

Easy, one + PCR test or a antibodies test should be proof enough.

[westcoastforme]

Originally Posted by Jimmyp25

Nicholas Karl - Scientist - Pfizer | LinkedInhttps://www.linkedin.com › nicholas-karl-a51264139
Experienced Biochemist with a demonstrated history of working in the pharmaceutical/diagnostics/health care industry. Skilled in Luminex, ELISA, OriginLab, ...



looks like he is on damage control already.... deleted his Linkedin

We’ve known this all along. I had Covid in may. I may have up to 13x the full spectrum antibodies compared to partial spectrum antibodies of the LAB JAB


I’ll never get the poke. Lies on top of lies

[Roboteer]

Originally Posted by logiatype

Sorry but this guy is a nobody.

TRANSLATION: I can't refute what he's saying here, but I hate it anyway. So I'll call him names, and see if I can fool anybody into believing me instead of him.

Project Veritas is a joke IMO.

TRANSLATION: Same for them. I can't refute what Project Veritas is pointing out here either, but I hate them even more than I hate Nicholas Karl. Time for more namecalling and hoping somebody believes me somewhere.

[redguard57]

Originally Posted by GoldenPineTree

Easy, one + PCR test or a antibodies test should be proof enough.

Even that would have to be relatively recent. Within 6 months or so, requiring getting a blood test now and then.

[GoldenPineTree]

Originally Posted by redguard57

Even that would have to be relatively recent. Within 6 months or so, requiring getting a blood test now and then.

Why? To make sure their antibodies haven't waned? We should then do that with vaccinated individuals as their antibodies wane faster.

[Spottednikes]

Originally Posted by GoldenPineTree

Why? To make sure their antibodies haven't waned? We should then do that with vaccinated individuals as their antibodies wane faster.

I had cv july 7 2020. Showed strong antibodies aug 15 2020. Just got antibody tested 9/24/2021, and still have strong pos response.

[Sprawling_Homeowner]

Originally Posted by Elliott_CA

Anti-vaxxer propaganda producers are merchants of death.

No refutation to what the people here have said....

People like you who defend an experimental treatment are the very sheep upon which these campaigns depend.