Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Status:
"Moldy Tater Gangrene, even before Moscow Marge."
(set 10 days ago)
Location: Dallas, TX
5,790 posts, read 3,605,492 times
Reputation: 5697
Advertisements
What's so bad about the whites falling below 50% of the US population?
The English, the founders of the thirteen colonies, have bee well below 50% for generations (more Germans than English). Yet we still speak English. We still operate under English Common Law (barring historically French Louisiana).
So I don't see what the threat to White-Anglo-Saxon-Christian America is.
Whites or the foundation of this country, whichever you want to use, they are interchangeable, the usurpers like to use whites because it makes you look bad if you try to argue against it, have ALREADY been invaded enough that the country is just waiting to balkanize like any properly invaded country would. Maybe if the democrats could lay off of race dividing everyone could become americans, but they know what they're doing. And they know what they're doing when they flood all the forums with "I don't see any evidence".
The whole racist concept of the 'great replacement theory' makes me laugh.
For one thing, this land was stolen from Native Americans, aka people who are not white. So unless you're native, this land really isn't yours to be 'replaced' on.
Yes it is. We fought for it and won it. Don’t like it, I don’t know what to tell you. You leftists act like war and land grabs were absent from North American before Europeans arrived. Really quite an ignorant stance.
Japan, South Korea and China are actively trying to increase immigration.
Also Japan’s economy ha sheen in stagnation for a long time. The reason Western Europe and U.S.A want to increase immigration is because they want to stay competitive economically. China, India, Brazil, Nigeria, Egypt, Turkey, Mexico, Iran, Philippines, Indonesia and Vietnam just on population alone are only gonna dwarf the European economies in importance as time moves along. A world where Western Europe and North America is secondary or tertiary in economic acceptance is something not only the governments find distasteful but the populace finds distasteful too.
If we had no immigration, in roughly 20 years time, Indonesia/India and China would dwarf the U.S economy and much of Western Europe would be in outright decline. South Korea and Japan already have a powerful economy but is still infinitely smaller than nearby China and they don’t have the same complex to feel on top of the world. But even today just for their economies to continue stagnating rather than shrink their inviting foreigners at a very high rate.
China also has a massive internal population that is still rural not to mention growing minority populations that it can depend on for labor, such as Tibetans, Uighurs and Mongols, not to mention more integrated minorities like Manchus, Hui and the mountain groups of SW China.
Russia which is certainly not a country people associate with White Genocide purposefully encourages and let’s in millions of Central Asian Muslims as well as Russian descended folks from Central Asia into the country. Putin even has a policy of claiming groups like Belorussians, Tartars and Ukrainians to be the same people as Russians and is trying to reintegrate these folks into his country. Not to mention far Eastern Russia has a massive migration of Chinese into mostly depopulated and fertile land.
Russia is actually the country with one of the heaviest minority population in Europe. More than all of Western Europe at just 81% Russian and decreasing.
Most African countries, all of the Arab Peninsula are all seeing massive migration from around the world which is again a sign of globalization not any nefarious group targeting whites.
Theirs millions of Venezuelans sin Brazil and Colombia, millions of Syrians in Turkey and Lebanon. Millions of Indians and Filipinos in the Arab Peninsula. The Arab Peninsula in fact got his day has far more migration than any European country.
Thousands of Rwandans in Congo. Even Rwanda has a Islamic neighborhood in its capital filled with migrants from Islamic African countries. Thousands of Africans from across the continent in South Africa. 2,000,000 estimated Nigerians in Ghana, many there illegally.
Millions of Bangladeshi Bengalis in India. The Afghan/Pakistani border basically doesn’t exist.
In fact America and Western Europe are some of the least ethnically diverse countries especially talking sheer volume. Even Afghanistan barely has a racial majority, with Hazara being of an obviously different race to Pashtuns and Tajiks not to mention the Turkmen and Uzbek ethnic groups who are central Asian and thus Turkic groups.
Japan, South Korea and China are actively trying to increase immigration.
Also Japan’s economy ha sheen in stagnation for a long time. The reason Western Europe and U.S.A want to increase immigration is because they want to stay competitive economically. China, India, Brazil, Nigeria, Egypt, Turkey, Mexico, Iran, Philippines, Indonesia and Vietnam just on population alone are only gonna dwarf the European economies in importance as time moves along. A world where Western Europe and North America is secondary or tertiary in economic acceptance is something not only the governments find distasteful but the populace finds distasteful too.
If we had no immigration, in roughly 20 years time, Indonesia/India and China would dwarf the U.S economy and much of Western Europe would be in outright decline. South Korea and Japan already have a powerful economy but is still infinitely smaller than nearby China and they don’t have the same complex to feel on top of the world. But even today just for their economies to continue stagnating rather than shrink their inviting foreigners at a very high rate.
China also has a massive internal population that is still rural not to mention growing minority populations that it can depend on for labor, such as Tibetans, Uighurs and Mongols, not to mention more integrated minorities like Manchus, Hui and the mountain groups of SW China.
Russia which is certainly not a country people associate with White Genocide purposefully encourages and let’s in millions of Central Asian Muslims as well as Russian descended folks from Central Asia into the country. Putin even has a policy of claiming groups like Belorussians, Tartars and Ukrainians to be the same people as Russians and is trying to reintegrate these folks into his country. Not to mention far Eastern Russia has a massive migration of Chinese into mostly depopulated and fertile land.
Russia is actually the country with one of the heaviest minority population in Europe. More than all of Western Europe at just 81% Russian and decreasing.
Most African countries, all of the Arab Peninsula are all seeing massive migration from around the world which is again a sign of globalization not any nefarious group targeting whites.
Theirs millions of Venezuelans sin Brazil and Colombia, millions of Syrians in Turkey and Lebanon. Millions of Indians and Filipinos in the Arab Peninsula. The Arab Peninsula in fact got his day has far more migration than any European country.
Thousands of Rwandans in Congo. Even Rwanda has a Islamic neighborhood in its capital filled with migrants from Islamic African countries. Thousands of Africans from across the continent in South Africa. 2,000,000 estimated Nigerians in Ghana, many there illegally.
Millions of Bangladeshi Bengalis in India. The Afghan/Pakistani border basically doesn’t exist.
In fact America and Western Europe are some of the least ethnically diverse countries especially talking sheer volume. Even Afghanistan barely has a racial majority, with Hazara being of an obviously different race to Pashtuns and Tajiks not to mention the Turkmen and Uzbek ethnic groups who are central Asian and thus Turkic groups.
America has 3000 nuclear weapons. We don't need to import a billion people, nor should we, to stay "competitive" or relevant.
Our country will be as filthy as Bejing and Calcutta in no time if we don't knock it off fast.
America has 3000 nuclear weapons. We don't need to import a billion people, nor should we, to stay "competitive" or relevant.
Our country will be as filthy as Bejing and Calcutta in no time if we don't knock it off fast.
You can’t nuke your competitors just because they have a bigger economy than you. I’m saying that if we hadn’t had the large amount of immigration we had since the 1950s we would be far and away the 2nd largest economy in the world and all the talented Indians, Mexicans and Chinese members of our society would be in their home countries creating companies there.
Now this might be preferable to you. But I’m real terms the U.S would be significantly less dominant on the global stage as the economy of the world would orbit even more around Asia. The richest man in the U.K was an Indian immigrant, and many of the richest folks in the U.K and America are immigrants too. Without immigration America would be something like 75% White, 20% Black and 5% Other as well. Some people have this weird belief that the country was always 90% white. It has actually never crossed 90% in the entire history of the U.S as a nation. Their was already a million non-black minorities in America by 1900. The closest it got was 89.7% in 1940 due to white immigration. In all the decades before that the black contribution to America was much larger and over 10%. Not to mention the Native and Hispanic population that has always been around, in the hundreds of thousands, especially in the Western half of the country.
We literally have a state. Hawaii that has never had a white majority in its entire history.
You can’t nuke your competitors just because they have a bigger economy than you. I’m saying that if we hadn’t had the large amount of immigration we had since the 1950s we would be far and away the 2nd largest economy in the world and all the talented Indians, Mexicans and Chinese members of our society would be in their home countries creating companies there.
Now this might be preferable to you. But I’m real terms the U.S would be significantly less dominant on the global stage as the economy of the world would orbit even more around Asia. The richest man in the U.K was an Indian immigrant, and many of the richest folks in the U.K and America are immigrants too. Without immigration America would be something like 75% White, 20% Black and 5% Other as well. Some people have this weird belief that the country was always 90% white. It has actually never crossed 90% in the entire history of the U.S as a nation. Their was already a million non-black minorities in America by 1900. The closest it got was 89.7% in 1940 due to white immigration. In all the decades before that the black contribution to America was much larger and over 10%. Not to mention the Native and Hispanic population that has always been around, in the hundreds of thousands, especially in the Western half of the country.
We literally have a state. Hawaii that has never had a white majority in its entire history.
Every state is basically like their own country - the states came before the federal government. My state was 98% at one point.
Anyways you are right, I don't subscribe to this silly notion that America must be the dominant superpower of the world. I don't know if I ever have.
I am am isolationist - in other words, a true conservative. We should have closed our borders in 1980, and kept our house in order.
Yes it is. We fought for it and won it. Don’t like it, I don’t know what to tell you. You leftists act like war and land grabs were absent from North American before Europeans arrived. Really quite an ignorant stance.
Not only that but there were no native Americans. Everyone migrated here from somewhere else so how did that make them natives?
Tucker Carlson has said the point of immigration is to bring in democrat voting minorities to displace republican voting white people.
But I don't see any evidence for this. Blacks have a declining share, while the fastest growing states with the highest fertility are often white states like Utah.
Latinos are becoming more competitive and in no way guarantee blue votes. They are trending republican nationwide and the majority identify as white.
Asians are a small minority, and even then first generation Asians are very conservative on social issues compared to their more Americanized counterparts.
Furthermore, the desire for more immigration comes from the lack of a desire to educate a workforce in America when that workforce can be imported (H1B visas) and the want for cheap migrant labor to help with manual labor. I don't see much of an emphasis on using them to displace whites to defeat republicans.
Maybe you haven't noticed but illegal aliens are replacing both American Blacks and Latinos by undercutting their wages. Maybe that is the reason Blacks who have been lied too for a hundred years and now Latinos are turning to the GOP because they see what this administration is doing and hurting them financially with its open border policy.
You are close to the Haitians being dropped off in the middle of night in White Plains NY?....maybe some are in your lily white neighborhood right now.
Whites or the foundation of this country, whichever you want to use, they are interchangeable, the usurpers like to use whites because it makes you look bad if you try to argue against it, have ALREADY been invaded enough that the country is just waiting to balkanize like any properly invaded country would. Maybe if the democrats could lay off of race dividing everyone could become americans, but they know what they're doing. And they know what they're doing when they flood all the forums with "I don't see any evidence".
Those who say "I don't see any evidence" are probably too young to have seen this transformation take place. Anyone born after 1965 was born during and after this transformation took place so they don't know any different. Illegal immigration accelerated during the 80's to. Now we have "immigrants" who don't assimilate into our society but retain their cultures and languages out in mainstream America. Yes, we are being balkinized
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
