Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-06-2021, 04:51 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,173 posts, read 26,207,141 times
Reputation: 27914

Advertisements

Yahoo reports that.........

"In an attempt to track down criminals, federal investigators have started using new “keyword warrants” and used them to ask Google to provide them information on anyone who searched a victim’s name or their address during a particular year, an accidentally unsealed court document that Forbes found shows." ..........snip.............
"“This never-before-possible technique threatens First Amendment interests and will inevitably sweep up innocent people, especially if the keyword terms are not unique and the time frame not precise. To make matters worse, police are currently doing this in secret, which insulates the practice from public debate and regulation,” she added."


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...-search-terms/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-06-2021, 05:46 AM
 
80 posts, read 80,307 times
Reputation: 50
Google is also filtering and misdirecting searches at an increasing rate. Such that it is not a good search engine any longer. There are many many search engines out there. There is not need to use google any longer. Avoid duckduck, very slow and you cannot use advanced syntax. The Feds are more and more like the old soviet KGB with every passing day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2021, 06:02 AM
Status: "UB Tubbie" (set 26 days ago)
 
20,050 posts, read 20,867,177 times
Reputation: 16741
I use DDG. No problems.
Commie Google blows.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2021, 07:12 AM
 
28,122 posts, read 12,608,522 times
Reputation: 15341
Thankfully police can be selective in what they enforce!


I encourage everyone to type in the kind of things they are looking for, (clog up the system).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2021, 06:57 PM
 
9,101 posts, read 6,324,331 times
Reputation: 12332
Haven't used Google search in over 5 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2021, 07:21 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,758,281 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by old_cold View Post
Yahoo reports that.........

"In an attempt to track down criminals, federal investigators have started using new “keyword warrants” and used them to ask Google to provide them information on anyone who searched a victim’s name or their address during a particular year, an accidentally unsealed court document that Forbes found shows." ..........snip.............
"“This never-before-possible technique threatens First Amendment interests and will inevitably sweep up innocent people, especially if the keyword terms are not unique and the time frame not precise. To make matters worse, police are currently doing this in secret, which insulates the practice from public debate and regulation,” she added."


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...-search-terms/
I choose not to click on ^.

Here is the source of the source, a Forbes article.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasb...h=3b0ad7c47c97

Such warrants are nothing new.

I assume zero online privacy and don’t have anything to hide.

Since I use a credit card for nearly everything, including $1 ice tea or Cokes at Mc Donald’s and belong to too many loyalty plans, I assume my purchasing habits are on record, somewhere.

I have a smart phone too.

If this information helps LE find a kidnapper, rapist, killer, terrorist etc so be it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2021, 07:22 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,758,281 times
Reputation: 20674
Google has an 86% market share. I don’t think it is too concerned about competition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2021, 07:26 PM
 
8,726 posts, read 7,416,359 times
Reputation: 12612
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Google has an 86% market share. I don’t think it is too concerned about competition.
Many giants had a great market share, all to see it erode away, so I do think Google is concerned, or should be at least.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2021, 07:28 PM
 
15,534 posts, read 10,507,413 times
Reputation: 15813
Google sucks now anyway, I haven't used it in months.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2021, 07:30 PM
 
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
2,912 posts, read 1,249,675 times
Reputation: 4314
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Google has an 86% market share. I don’t think it is too concerned about competition.
So you're of oligarch like monopolies then?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top