Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-26-2021, 11:59 AM
 
Location: The Piedmont of North Carolina
6,012 posts, read 2,835,083 times
Reputation: 7618

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldhag1 View Post
Interesting, because the Loudoun County School Board says this didn't happen.....

Will there be any consequences for the Loudoun County School Board over this? Doubtful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-01-2021, 08:13 AM
 
1,692 posts, read 1,528,969 times
Reputation: 1417
Arrow GOP Big Lie About Loudoun School Sex Assault Case

The real story behind the recent sex assault case in Loudoun County, Virginia:

The Right’s Big Lie About a Sexual Assault in Virginia - New York Times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2021, 08:14 AM
 
Location: Howard County, Maryland
16,553 posts, read 10,611,270 times
Reputation: 36572
Not about to "reward" the New York Times by creating an account. Could you please summarize what the "lie" is in this case?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2021, 08:21 AM
 
Location: OH->FL->NJ
17,003 posts, read 12,586,399 times
Reputation: 8921
Quote:
Originally Posted by bus man View Post
Not about to "reward" the New York Times by creating an account. Could you please summarize what the "lie" is in this case?
Ditto. I dont do paywalls. not right wing ones either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2021, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,227 posts, read 26,182,129 times
Reputation: 15625
The daughter had two prior consensual encounters with the girl and the boy was indeed wearing a skirt but that did not entitle him with access to the girls bathroom. This had nothing to do with the schools bathroom policy in any event as it was approved in August well after the assault.

Those protestors owe the school board members an apology.

Quote:
But this week, during a juvenile court hearing, a fuller picture of Smith’s daughter’s ordeal emerged. She suffered something atrocious. It had nothing at all to do, however, with trans bathroom policies. Instead, like many women and girls, she was a victim of relationship violence.

Smith’s daughter testified that she’d previously had two consensual sexual encounters with her attacker in the school bathroom. On the day of her assault, they’d agreed to meet up again. “The evidence was that the girl chose that bathroom, but her intent was to talk to him, not to engage in sexual relations,” Biberaj, whose office prosecuted the case, told me. The boy, however, expected sex and refused to accept the girl’s refusal. As the The Washington Post reported, she testified, “He flipped me over. I was on the ground and couldn’t move and he sexually assaulted me.”

The boy was indeed wearing a skirt, but that skirt didn’t authorize him to use the girls’ bathroom. As Amanda Terkel reported in HuffPost, the school district’s trans-inclusive bathroom policies were approved only in August, more than two months after the assault. This was not, said Biberaj, someone “identifying as transgender and going into the girls’ bathroom under the guise of that.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/28/o...nty-trans.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2021, 08:24 AM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,706 posts, read 34,534,911 times
Reputation: 29285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
The daughter had two prior consensual encounters with the girl and the boy was indeed wearing a skirt but that did not entitle him with access to the girls bathroom. This had nothing to do with the schools bathroom policy in any event as it was approved in August well after the assault.

Those protestors owe the school board members an apology.




https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/28/o...nty-trans.html
funny how quickly the NYSlimes decided that 'no means no' is no longer valid if it fails to serve their leftist agenda
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2021, 08:28 AM
 
8,167 posts, read 6,920,059 times
Reputation: 8374
Behind a paywall for me, too.
So I found this, which has the gist of the NYT article at the link:



Quote:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o...rape-apologist

Michelle Goldberg, the New York Times's hypocritical rape apologist



Are we just going to ignore that the school board, which admits now there have been additional sexual assault cases it covered up, lied about the girl’s assault during a hearing on a proposed transgender policy? Are we going to pretend the rape and the subsequent misconduct by school officials isn’t relevant to the policy they debated at the time?

Goldberg’s article, loosely paraphrased, argues: "Yes, the boy raped one girl in a bathroom and reportedly sexually assaulted another girl, and school administrators covered it up and lied about it during a hearing on transgender policies, but the first case, the one with the forcible sodomy, isn't as bad as conservatives say it is. You see, the victim said yes previously…”

By this standard, there is no such thing as marital rape. And most of those campus rape cases? Turns out they are automatically not so bad. Many of those accusers consented at some point in the past. Surely, they don't teach us any broader lessons!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2021, 08:32 AM
 
1,952 posts, read 827,682 times
Reputation: 2670
New York Times


Always an unbiased news source.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2021, 08:38 AM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,055 posts, read 18,231,767 times
Reputation: 34937
Quote:
Originally Posted by .sparrow. View Post
Behind a paywall for me, too.
So I found this, which has the gist of the NYT article at the link:
Really ? "rape isn't so bad". Are they trying to normalize rape because at one point in the past the girl said "yes" ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2021, 08:45 AM
 
29,447 posts, read 14,631,447 times
Reputation: 14421
Okay, these rapes didn't happen due to the school districts bathroom policy, rape still took place and the school district tried to cover it up.

And then Michelle Goldberg NYT journalist tried to down play it because the victim has said yes previously ? Wow. It seems like women's rights are actually regressing.

"Goldberg’s article, loosely paraphrased, argues: "Yes, the boy raped one girl in a bathroom and reportedly sexually assaulted another girl, and school administrators covered it up and lied about it during a hearing on transgender policies, but the first case, the one with the forcible sodomy, isn't as bad as conservatives say it is. You see, the victim said yes previously…”"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top