Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-28-2021, 12:41 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,212 posts, read 19,210,527 times
Reputation: 14911

Advertisements

That was not the letter Garland sent. Read your link.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-28-2021, 12:43 PM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,385,616 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
100% holding his feet to the fire, in my opinion. NO WAY should the DOJ be involved in any of this. It's an overreach. We have local police departments, if needed.

Grandstanding? Nearly all of them are always grandstanding, so you'll get no argument from me there.

Holding his feet to the fire for what? Saying the DOJ would stand against violations of federal laws? Stop the press!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2021, 12:45 PM
 
5,097 posts, read 2,315,466 times
Reputation: 3338
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Holding his feet to the fire for what? Saying the DOJ would stand against violations of federal laws? Stop the press!
What violation of which federal law?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2021, 12:45 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,564,185 times
Reputation: 29289
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
That was not the letter Garland sent. Read your link.
that's correct. the memo and decision that garland based everything on was the NSBA letter that squealed about parents being 'domestic terrorists.'
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2021, 12:47 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,212 posts, read 19,210,527 times
Reputation: 14911
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo58 View Post
In that transcript, Cotton seems to be jumping around a bit - some of his questions don't even make sense. There was nothing in there about critical race theory - Cotton was talking about the father of a girl in Virginia who was raped. About that, Garland said:

"Anyone whose child was raped is the most horrific crime I can imagine and is protected by the First Amendment to protest to their school board about this."

Cotton said that Garland should resign, but it doesn't say "resign in disgrace". Why did you put those words in his mouth?
I think what they are driving at is that they want Garland to resign before he has a chance to lock Trump up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2021, 12:47 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,615,406 times
Reputation: 29385
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Holding his feet to the fire for what? Saying the DOJ would stand against violations of federal laws? Stop the press!
See post #73.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2021, 12:47 PM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,385,616 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by fat lou View Post
What violation of which federal law?
Depends. Who's been charged?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2021, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,212 posts, read 19,210,527 times
Reputation: 14911
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwest09 View Post
A simple question presented to Garlend. "Yes or No". And he dodges the question, and plays stupid.
Or maybe the question was too stupid to deserve an answer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2021, 12:51 PM
 
5,097 posts, read 2,315,466 times
Reputation: 3338
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Depends. Who's been charged?
It sounds like that's your question to answer, not mine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2021, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,212 posts, read 19,210,527 times
Reputation: 14911
Quote:
Originally Posted by kj1065 View Post
I meant exactly what I wrote. I could not be more clear.
I understood it completely. You intended it to be ambiguous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top