Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Oh? In that case, can you quote for me what AG Garland said the fed gov would do regarding threats made to random other parents in the school district and NOT the school board?
It IS the point in context of the post I quoted.
My point is that a truly neutral AG/FBI would not have gotten involved in the first place. But since THIS AG/FBI got involved, we should not expect neutrality even though we can demand it. This is a 3rd World level 'Justice' dept.
My point is that a truly neutral AG/FBI would not have gotten involved in the first place. But since THIS AG/FBI got involved, we should not expect neutrality even though we can demand it. This is a 3rd World level 'Justice' dept.
A "truly neutral AG/FBI" wouldn't get involved in questions of federal law?
It seems the only people making threats are the Pro-CRT people. Will anything come of this? Apparently, he has more than 1000 "soldiers" ready. Soldiers? That sounds like Marxist revolution talk!
Can anyone imagine this goofball on the Supreme Court. Thank you Mitch McConnell.
A "truly neutral AG/FBI" wouldn't get involved in questions of federal law?
Interesting take.
So some parents got angry and said some nasty things to some LOCAL school board members. How does this qualify as a federal case? That would be an interesting take on law enforcement.
So some parents got angry and said some nasty things to some LOCAL school board members. How does this qualify as a federal case? That would be an interesting take on law enforcement.
There's the memo. It doesn't reference any specific federal statutes that I can see.
Yes, so THIS AG/FBI should not have gotten involved in the first place. But since THIS AG/FBI got involved, we expect the same treatment for Malikk Austin even though Austin hinted violence at the parents and not at the school board. But that same treatment will never happen because THIS AG/FBI is now a political wing of the Democratic Party.
Yes, so THIS AG/FBI should not have gotten involved in the first place. But since THIS AG/FBI got involved, we expect the same treatment for Malikk Austin even though Austin hinted violence at the parents and not at the school board. But that same treatment will never happen because THIS AG/FBI is now a political wing of the Democratic Party.
Well, the AG/FBI involvement in any of this remains to be seen, doesn't it? Has anything beyond a memo actually happened at this point? So, IF you can demonstrate that the FBI is somehow less involved with this specific scenario than other scenarios, you'll have a point. Until then.....
It seems the only people making threats are the Pro-CRT people. Will anything come of this? Apparently, he has more than 1000 "soldiers" ready. Soldiers? That sounds like Marxist revolution talk!
I think he should have been arrested, just for being a jerk, but from what I could read on several articles, he did not communicate an actual threat of violence. Only that he had a group of 1000 soldiers to back him up.
It's not like he was Kyle Rittenhause, going to another state to shoot people for having a protest. He just said some words, and when it got too intense, the police escorted him out.
(I think he was way out of line, but if I try to view the world through Right-wing standards, and I immagine he was fighting for gun rights, or to protect strangers from blacks speaking up for their rights, then in that light, I think the right would be defending him. )
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.