Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-19-2021, 07:30 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,379,218 times
Reputation: 10467

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by berdee View Post
Can you prove those bricks belong to that building?


btw, I'm not saying they are are aren't

Nope. Can you prove they don't? Occam's Razor is fully in play here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-19-2021, 08:20 AM
 
Location: Texas Hill Country
23,652 posts, read 13,987,571 times
Reputation: 18856
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunGrins View Post
That's why not every participant is charged in these events. Intent is important. If you bring a battering ram, pipe bomb, weapons, gallows, gasoline containers, body armor, or attack the police it's a good bet that you are not there just for chanting slogans.


In Kenosha, Kyle took a weapon to a demonstration but claims self defense in shooting and killing people. He didn't belong there (and neither did the rioters) and should not have possessed a weapon. That shows intent.

So Kyle, brandishing a lethal weapon, claims self defense as his motivation even though, by his presence, he incited the confrontation. If he was shot by a rioter they also could claim self defense as well. He certainly represents an armed threat.

If a peaceful protestor is attacked (unwarranted) by the police with a lethal club or rubber bullets or some weapon (maybe a knee on the neck) and the protestor fights back, would that also be self defense? Do the police represent a threat? The BLM protests often start from a perceived unwarranted police use of lethal force, usually against an unarmed suspect. The question of intent applies to both the police and protesters. In Kenosha, an uncharged person was shot four times in the back and paralyzed. Now, if there are "bad apples" among the police, as we hear there are, there are also the same among the protesters. These confrontational situations spiral out of control very easily. The presence of armed unauthorized militia, self-appointed vigilanties, is a provocation and should be dealt with by the police the same as they would the protesters, not cozied up to with bottled water and encouragement.

Something like that.


My right wing friends would be best not to ask my opinion for they would not like what they hear. As civilians who can carry a gun (leaving out his legality in that matter), there is a saying, "Now that you can carry a gun, don't go anyplace where you couldn't carry a gun.". As civilians, we are expected not to go to a place where we expect we will need a gun, we are expected to avoid those places........


..........and he was in direct counter to that philosophy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2021, 10:03 AM
 
Location: alexandria, VA
16,352 posts, read 8,094,094 times
Reputation: 9726
Quote:
Originally Posted by TamaraSavannah View Post
Something like that.


My right wing friends would be best not to ask my opinion for they would not like what they hear. As civilians who can carry a gun (leaving out his legality in that matter), there is a saying, "Now that you can carry a gun, don't go anyplace where you couldn't carry a gun.". As civilians, we are expected not to go to a place where we expect we will need a gun, we are expected to avoid those places........


..........and he was in direct counter to that philosophy.
This is true. Carrying a gun into a riot because you think you might need it is irresponsible and idiotic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2021, 11:34 AM
YAZ
 
Location: Phoenix,AZ
7,708 posts, read 14,084,935 times
Reputation: 7044
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunGrins View Post
That's why not every participant is charged in these events. Intent is important. If you bring a battering ram, pipe bomb, weapons, gallows, gasoline containers, body armor, or attack the police it's a good bet that you are not there just for chanting slogans.


In Kenosha, Kyle took a weapon to a demonstration but claims self defense in shooting and killing people. He didn't belong there (and neither did the rioters) and should not have possessed a weapon. That shows intent.

So Kyle, brandishing a lethal weapon, claims self defense as his motivation even though, by his presence, he incited the confrontation. If he was shot by a rioter they also could claim self defense as well. He certainly represents an armed threat.

If a peaceful protestor is attacked (unwarranted) by the police with a lethal club or rubber bullets or some weapon (maybe a knee on the neck) and the protestor fights back, would that also be self defense? Do the police represent a threat? The BLM protests often start from a perceived unwarranted police use of lethal force, usually against an unarmed suspect. The question of intent applies to both the police and protesters. In Kenosha, an uncharged person was shot four times in the back and paralyzed. Now, if there are "bad apples" among the police, as we hear there are, there are also the same among the protesters. These confrontational situations spiral out of control very easily. The presence of armed unauthorized militia, self-appointed vigilanties, is a provocation and should be dealt with by the police the same as they would the protesters, not cozied up to with bottled water and encouragement.
It's a great opinion. Well stated and thorough.

Problem is, you didn't incorporate judicial standards. This is a trial based on judicial standards, not public opinion.

It is what it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2021, 11:37 AM
YAZ
 
Location: Phoenix,AZ
7,708 posts, read 14,084,935 times
Reputation: 7044
Quote:
Originally Posted by r small View Post
This is true. Carrying a gun into a riot because you think you might need it is irresponsible and idiotic.
Er....let's rephrase that....

Attacking a person with a firearm is not responsible and idiotic.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2021, 11:55 AM
Status: "UB Tubbie" (set 24 days ago)
 
20,046 posts, read 20,850,556 times
Reputation: 16739
Anyone got eyes on those bricks?
Is the pile shrinking now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2021, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Nowhere
10,098 posts, read 4,087,720 times
Reputation: 7086
These gutless terrorists/thugs (BLM, Antifa et al) are too cowardly to do anything. You know why? It's 15* outside right now here in the Upper Midwest. These pathetic terrorists are too weak to go out in the cold.


So...they aren't going to do anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2021, 01:11 PM
 
2,690 posts, read 1,612,851 times
Reputation: 9918
What do they need bricks for? A person can now walk around with an AR15 to protests and shoot anybody who they believe is challenging them, claiming self defense. This includes those the above poster mentioned, Antifa, BLM, or whomever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2021, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Texas Hill Country
23,652 posts, read 13,987,571 times
Reputation: 18856
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoMansLands View Post
What do they need bricks for? A person can now walk around with an AR15 to protests and shoot anybody who they believe is challenging them, claiming self defense. This includes those the above poster mentioned, Antifa, BLM, or whomever.
Well, are bricks in more plentiful supply, cheaper, that .223?

Now, I have seen the price come down on some of it but got to remember that during the pandemic, available supply was priced out of sight! What was the availability of bricks?

Last edited by TamaraSavannah; 11-19-2021 at 02:26 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2021, 03:38 PM
 
9,500 posts, read 2,919,226 times
Reputation: 5283
Are they confiscating the bricks? During all the BLM protests and riots they found a pile of bricks during a protest and the city just piled it in their trucks and took it away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top