Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-21-2021, 04:33 PM
 
1,912 posts, read 1,130,026 times
Reputation: 3192

Advertisements

Think of some of the awful presidents who the US has had over the past 20 years. Inexperienced and divisive. And think of the awful presidential candidates who the US has had.

Countries with parliamentary systems of picking a head of government, such as the UK, would not have picked such people. In a parliamentary system, the legislature picks the prime minister; s/he isn’t directly elected by voters.

Wouldn’t a parliamentary system result in better choices to fill the office of president?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-21-2021, 04:48 PM
 
Location: King County, WA
15,841 posts, read 6,547,612 times
Reputation: 13333
A parliamentary system has its own drawbacks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2021, 07:45 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,870,209 times
Reputation: 10371
How about we promote local control which is what the founders envisioned instead of the one size fits all approach?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2021, 07:57 AM
 
158 posts, read 72,621 times
Reputation: 198
No. You're giving the legislative branch way too much power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2021, 08:13 AM
 
1,263 posts, read 561,998 times
Reputation: 1181
As it stands now, the States select the President. Each State has just so chosen to allow their citizenry to vote for that state's allotment of electoral votes.

The 50 states could decide tomorrow to allow their governors or legislatures to send the electors on behalf of the people. They could also just as easily decide based on a boxing match or sack race between party heads.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2021, 08:15 AM
 
Location: South of Heaven
7,928 posts, read 3,473,493 times
Reputation: 11617
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
How about we promote local control which is what the founders envisioned instead of the one size fits all approach?
I've been told that is impossible because of the interstate commerce clause. It apparently gives control of everything to the federal government. It essentially nullifies the 10th amendment, because there is no issue that the commerce clause does not delegate to the federal government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2021, 08:17 AM
 
Location: OH->FL->NJ
17,005 posts, read 12,595,161 times
Reputation: 8925
Top 5 jungle primary combined with ranked choice voting on 2 part printed cards (Security) for president.
National primary held third weekend (Sat thru Tues) in August. 60 day campaign before that.
National election First weekend in Nov (Sat thru Tues)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2021, 08:19 AM
 
Location: A Nation Possessed
25,749 posts, read 18,818,821 times
Reputation: 22600
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSPNative View Post
Wouldn’t a parliamentary system pick better executives than a presidential system
No system will pick a better president when a large segment of the populace has been brainwashed into accepting that authoritarian collectivism is a desirable form of government.

It's hard to save idiots from themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2021, 08:19 AM
 
4,873 posts, read 3,603,191 times
Reputation: 3881
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSPNative View Post
Think of some of the awful presidents who the US has had over the past 20 years. Inexperienced and divisive. And think of the awful presidential candidates who the US has had.

Countries with parliamentary systems of picking a head of government, such as the UK, would not have picked such people. In a parliamentary system, the legislature picks the prime minister; s/he isn’t directly elected by voters.

Wouldn’t a parliamentary system result in better choices to fill the office of president?
I see somebody missed the Boris Johnson saga.


I do think a parliamentary system is better because it avoids to persistent gridlock the US faces, where Congress and the White House are from opposite parties, nothing gets done (or bad things get done), and most voters can't even understand which party is to blame.



I think it's critical to democracy that it be as clear as possible who is in charge, otherwise how can voters possibly make educated voting decisions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2021, 08:24 AM
 
13,601 posts, read 4,934,489 times
Reputation: 9687
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSPNative View Post
Think of some of the awful presidents who the US has had over the past 20 years. Inexperienced and divisive. And think of the awful presidential candidates who the US has had.

Countries with parliamentary systems of picking a head of government, such as the UK, would not have picked such people. In a parliamentary system, the legislature picks the prime minister; s/he isn’t directly elected by voters.

Wouldn’t a parliamentary system result in better choices to fill the office of president?
The leader of the party that controls the House of Commons becomes Prime Minister. If we had a parliamentary system here, the Prime Minister would probably be Nancy Pelosi. If the Republicans take over Congress it would probably be Mitch McConnell.

Donald Trump would probably not have been Prime Minister, because first he would have to win a seat in Congress.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:01 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top