Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If he didn't intend to shoot, why did he have his finger on the trigger or inside the trigger guard?????
That's where untrained/unpracticed people put their finger. It is one of the hardest habits to break a newby of. it's such a natural place to put your finger. It would be like breaking the habit of putting your hands on the steering wheel of a car before it's in drive (ready to fire) Not an excuse, just an observation.
That's where untrained/unpracticed people put their finger. It is one of the hardest habits to break a newby of. it's such a natural place to put your finger. It would be like breaking the habit of putting your hands on the steering wheel of a car before it's in drive (ready to fire) Not an excuse, just an observation.
Yes, it's what everyone does--until someone tells them differently. And then they have to practice not doing it.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,019 posts, read 12,125,187 times
Reputation: 10222
[quote]
Quote:
Originally Posted by berdee
For some reason these Baldwin threads seem to quickly be closed despite new info that had come out.
There's something strange about the guy Kenney. He was the one who had suggested they hire Hannah. He supplied the gun. He's apparently with the production, but many with the production seem to be unaware of it. His title with the production is "armorer mentor" and many in Hollywood is saying there is no such thing as a armorer mentor. https://nypost.com/2021/11/09/rust-a...olt-45-report/
While working on another production, Kenney asked Hannah's father to bring live rounds to the set to use for target practice, etc. Reed took the bullets he'd made. Kenney then stole some of the bullets and refused to return them.
During the Rust production, Kenney supplied boxes of blank ammo to them. He may have accidentally or intentionally mixed some of the stolen live bullets in with the blanks.
Being made with recycled parts it's possible that some of those live bullets may have had casings with the small hole that would indicate the bullet was a blank. Hannah's father probably knew what to look for, since he'd made them probably for his own use or for use under his control. But others who might have handled the bullets may not have been able to tell if they were live or blanks.
Being made with recycled parts it's possible that some of those live bullets may have had casings with the small hole that would indicate the bullet was a blank. Hannah's father probably knew what to look for, since he'd made them probably for his own use or for use under his control. But others who might have handled the bullets may not have been able to tell if they were live or blanks.
No, the propellant would have leaked out if there were a hole in the case to indicate a dummy round.
Plus, it appears to be standard Hollywood practice to put a b-b in the case of a dummy round rather than a hole. I suppose that prevents the hole from ever appearing on camera, with the b-b still providing a positive means of determining that it's a blank.
And a blank actually does have propellant...but lacks a bullet.
Any of them would have been difficult for someone with only a smattering of ammunition knowledge to distinguish while actually loaded in a revolver, where they could only be viewed from the rear of the casing.
It seems odd and expensive for them to be making dummy rounds from live rounds. It takes more equipment and effort to convert a live round to a dummy round than to build a dummy round from scratch. It's cheaper, quicker, and safer to build a dummy round from scratch (which are available online or at a sporting goods store).
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,019 posts, read 12,125,187 times
Reputation: 10222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph_Kirk
No, the propellant would have leaked out if there were a hole in the case to indicate a dummy round.
Plus, it appears to be standard Hollywood practice to put a b-b in the case of a dummy round rather than a hole. I suppose that prevents the hole from ever appearing on camera, with the b-b still providing a positive means of determining that it's a blank.
And a blank actually does have propellant...but lacks a bullet.
Any of them would have been difficult for someone with only a smattering of ammunition knowledge to distinguish while actually loaded in a revolver, where they could only be viewed from the rear of the casing.
Apparently some of the bullets in that box rattled and some didn't.
"No, the propellant would have leaked out if there were a hole in the case to indicate a dummy round.
And a blank actually does have propellant...but lacks a bullet."
huh?
Quote:
It seems odd and expensive for them to be making dummy rounds from live rounds. It takes more equipment and effort to convert a live round to a dummy round than to build a dummy round from scratch. It's cheaper, quicker, and safer to build a dummy round from scratch (which are available online or at a sporting goods store).
I don't know how anyone could mistake live ammunition for blanks? Unless of course you're Alec Baldwin.
From a view of the base of the round as seen in the chamber of a revolver, a live round looks exactly like a blank...and for that matter, exactly like a Hollywood dummy round. There might be a difference in the manufacturer branding stamped on the base, but someone who doesn't know those details wouldn't recognize it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.