Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If the crooks did not have guns, would the crime even be attempted?
Keep putting more guns into the population.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bergun
Your last sentence should read “Keep putting more CRIMINALS onto our street and except them to commit more crimes, with or without a firearm, since criminals are CRIMINALS and commit crimes.”
Yeah, I dont get that either. The dude was strangling the mom with his hands,..not a gun.
So many crimes are committed without a gun. Pushed into subways. Assaulted. All these mass Smash and grabs.
Let the vigilante movement begin. Citizens will do, what the police are unable to do (not because the police are inept, but because they've been stopped cold by gov't from doing their jobs).
I hope we don't wind up wasting money to house the perp in prison.
That is what republicans were trying to do with Rittenhouse. Be careful what you wish for. You may find out that sword cuts both ways.
That is what republicans were trying to do with Rittenhouse. Be careful what you wish for. You may find out that sword cuts both ways.
Rittenhouse isn't the first Cut though. Rittenhouse IS the 'both ways' other side of the sword equation of the Criminal coddling and lawlessness by weak leaders. Those were the people that weren't careful what they wished for.
If you had supplied a simple answer, there would have been no need or a followup.
Weird. I thought my answer was pretty simple. Oh well.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.