Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is what I think. The Great Replacement Theory implies genocide. What I am seeing is alot of people moving to California and then many people leaving. The question is WHY?
Article from the LA Times pointed out that the incoming White freshman class at UCLA is down to an abysmal 18.6% White.
Really, if you don't like the area where you live, maybe it's time to move. Neighborhoods and cities change all the time. Either accept the changes or find a place that suits you better.
Resurrecting this same thread every month or so is getting tiresome. Time to make a decision.
Really, if you don't like the area where you live, maybe it's time to move. Neighborhoods and cities change all the time. Either accept the changes or find a place that suits you better.
Resurrecting this same thread every month or so is getting tiresome. Time to make a decision.
The pace at which neighborhoods and cities have changed in California from 1980-2022 is unprecedented in history and uniquely neoliberal. People have a right to place and community. That is why enclavism is a good solution to adapt to multiculturalism.
As for the University demographic changes, the questions to ask is why has this change happened so rapidly. Maybe implicit affirmative action, though Asians numbers remained about the same. Also the LA Times article mentions less out of state students which is a more subtle form of anti-White discrimination.
I am actually open to the Singapore model of affirmative action, which seeks to maintain balance, not the woke version of it.
The pace at which neighborhoods and cities have changed in California from 1980-2022 is unprecedented in history and uniquely neoliberal. People have a right to place and community. That is why enclavism is a good solution to adapt to multiculturalism.
As for the University demographic changes, the questions to ask is why has this change happened so rapidly. Maybe implicit affirmative action, though Asians numbers remained about the same. Also the LA Times article mentions less out of state students which is a more subtle form of anti-White discrimination.
I am actually open to the Singapore model of affirmative action, which seeks to maintain balance, not the woke version of it.
The neighborhoods within cities and whole cities change all the time. You are looking at a 42 year span. That is two generations.
Why wouldn't you expect the local university to reflect the demographics of the area it resides in? Fewer out of state students at a state school is because it has gotten too expensive for out of staters.
The city in NJ where I was born is a place I could not safely reside in today. I would stick out like a sore thumb and would not be accepted. I have found other places to live during the course of my life that are more suitable for me.
Nothing stays the same. The world moves on and we have to move with it. You seem to be pining for what once was. You can't go back. That world does not exist anymore.
Last edited by ansible90; 08-12-2022 at 06:44 PM..
That percentage is not for UCLA but for the entire UC System consisting of all 9 undergrad campuses...none of the 9 campuses have over 30 percent caucasian students...many have much less than 18 percent as well.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.