Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yep, and you continued to post after that about everything I stated, unless you’re denying Gotti reference, folks being worried, Mitch being worried, because Trump being worried, etc…? Had you made your first statement and sat back and waited like you told others to do, then what you’re saying would be true and you’d be taking your own advice.
There’s no proof to because Trump inciting a riot.
There you go again.....There is no verdict about Trump. In my original post I was merely making a point that this statement from a Powerful Republican is more than likely worrisome to people who were involved in this. Does the "more than likely" wording make it more palatable?
Quote:
What happened: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told reporters he's watching the proceedings of the House Jan. 6 committee and looks forward to seeing what it finds.
"It will be interesting to reveal all the participants who were involved."
There you go again.....There is no verdict about Trump. In my original post I was merely making a point that this statement from a Powerful Republican is more than likely worrisome to people who were involved in this. Does the "more than likely" wording make it more palatable?
Had you stopped there your statement would’ve been valid, however, you continued to post assumptions, allegations, and speculate while having no proof, just feelings.
There’s no charges about because Trump, hence there’s no verdict.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.