Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-02-2022, 12:08 PM
 
1,250 posts, read 679,664 times
Reputation: 3164

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog View Post
Not sharing misinformation is part of Twitter's TOS --



Twitter was well within their rights to remove anyone from their own site for what they see as misinformation.

Twitter Help Center


Isn't that where anyone can post unverified reports os possible reactions to the vaccine? Kinda like turning in a school report based on information from Wikipedia? Your teacher probably would not accept that report.
You apparently don't realize VAERS is hosted by the CDC. You should be able to quote their numbers. Why wouldn't you be able to do that?

I have read that most of the reports are physician initiated. They're not just whimsical dalliances and flights of imagination.

In addition, deaths are marked "covid" when people die *with* covid, as opposed to *from* it - so the numbers are inflated. And if you have die with covid and are vaccinated, the deaths are not attributed to covid. There's a whole lot of rearranging and fudging of numbers by the CDC, which they actually ADMITTED last week!

Keep up!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-02-2022, 12:11 PM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,128 posts, read 18,290,317 times
Reputation: 34996
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog View Post
Isn't that where anyone can post unverified reports os possible reactions to the vaccine? Kinda like turning in a school report based on information from Wikipedia? Your teacher probably would not accept that report.
Wow.. So for decades VAERS was a valid reporting site for vaccine issues. All the folks pushing vaccines cited VAERS as the shining example of how vaccines were indeed "safe and effective" because of hardly any reports.

But along comes covid. Along comes a new vaccine never used in humans before.
The VAERS database explodes.

And now...VAERS is like wikopedia.


How can people go from trusting VAERS to not trusting VAERS so quick ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2022, 12:12 PM
 
Location: Wisco Disco
2,141 posts, read 1,210,311 times
Reputation: 3016
MTG suspended? Couldn't happen to a dimmer wit. Oh wait, it happened to rumpy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2022, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Gaston, South Carolina
15,713 posts, read 9,528,541 times
Reputation: 17617
Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkingandwondering View Post
You apparently don't realize VAERS is hosted by the CDC. You should be able to quote their numbers. Why wouldn't you be able to do that?
Oh, but I do. It mentions that right on the website, afterall. But anyone can report to VAERS. And anyone can misinterpret what they read on VAERS, too.

Quote:
VAERS is ripe for exploitation because it relies on unverified self-reports of side effects. Anyone who received a vaccine can submit a report. And because this information is publicly available, misinterpretations of its data has been used to amplify COVID-19 misinformation through dubious social media channels and mass media, including one of the most popular shows on cable news.
Quote:
Because VAERS claims are self-reported, they tell us something about what ordinary people, as opposed to doctors and medical researchers, think about vaccine safety. In other words, people who feel that a vaccine is responsible for a side effect they might be experiencing can log that concern with the federal government, whether or not those claims would stand scrutiny in rigorous clinical testing.
Unverified reports of vaccine side effects in VAERS aren’t the smoking guns portrayed by right-wing media outlets – they can offer insight into vaccine hesitancy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2022, 12:27 PM
 
8,419 posts, read 4,579,340 times
Reputation: 5599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog View Post
Not sharing misinformation is part of Twitter's TOS --



Twitter was well within their rights to remove anyone from their own site for what they see as misinformation.

Twitter Help Center


Isn't that where anyone can post unverified reports os possible reactions to the vaccine? Kinda like turning in a school report based on information from Wikipedia? Your teacher probably would not accept that report.

I didn't say it wasn't part of Twitters TOS, I said it was never a part of anyone's up until recently. You know how recently? Obviously right around the time of covid.


Until "true and verifiable information" stays that way for more then a week, who is Twitter to decide what is misinformation? Ah yes. The government. Still don't see a problem?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2022, 12:46 PM
 
25,451 posts, read 9,813,207 times
Reputation: 15341
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMSRetired View Post
The Ministry of Truth at work making sure people only hear what they want them to hear.
Their company, their rules.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2022, 12:47 PM
 
Location: In a city within a state where politicians come to get their PHDs in Corruption
2,907 posts, read 2,070,068 times
Reputation: 4478
This broad (MTG) is straight up nuts. Probably good in sack though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2022, 12:49 PM
 
8,419 posts, read 4,579,340 times
Reputation: 5599
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post
Their company, their rules.

The problem is who is influencing those rules?
A policy can be bad even if (in this case) it supports your opinion. I wish people could see the bigger picture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2022, 12:50 PM
 
25,451 posts, read 9,813,207 times
Reputation: 15341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Twitter isnt private.
Because they are public they can choose what content they want on their site.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2022, 12:51 PM
 
25,451 posts, read 9,813,207 times
Reputation: 15341
Quote:
Originally Posted by clutchcargo777 View Post
The problem is who is influencing those rules?
A policy can be bad even if (in this case) it supports your opinion. I wish people could see the bigger picture.
When misinformation is posted, Twitter has the right to delete it. Guess people have to really be able to dig deep and do their own research on what the truth is and isn't. That's the bigger picture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top