Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
First, rape requires penetration so unless the women are sodomizing them it is not rape.
Statuary rape is false pretext for enforcing gender equality.
Boys going through puberty have sexual fantasies often, and they (I know this from experience) will also masturbate.
An older female teacher helping them finish is not rape. The boy who is consenting is not a victim of rape. The only trauma comes afterwards when the adults tell them they have been abused and need to be given council and forever embarrassed by the event.
We have now crossed a line where a 17 year old student having sex with a 22 year old teacher is classified as rape. Not only are we belittling real rape victims, we are handing out harsh sentences that are undeserved.
Boys are different from girls, switching the gender is changing the situation. But since we want to remove all gender barriers to allow for trans people to operate without restriction we now equalize something horrendous (a pedophile raping a child) with an adult women helping a horny boy reach a climax.
It is inappropriate and it should be a firable offense, but come on, stop this nonsense. It is getting way too extreme.
We have to use our brains as a country and stop falling over ourselves with this dumb nonsense.
Boys going through puberty have sexual fantasies often, and they (I know this from experience) will also masturbate.
An older female teacher helping them finish is not rape. The boy who is consenting is not a victim of rape. The only trauma comes afterwards when the adults tell them they have been abused and need to be given council and forever embarrassed by the event.
Uh, no. It's rape. Lemme tell you a lil' secret--17 year old girls have sexual fantasies too (speaking from personal experience here), and some of had young, male teachers who were attractive that we had crushes on. It would have been wrong for them to 'help us finish'. And it's wrong for a female teacher to help her male student 'finish'.
Does it need to be punished the same as a guy that lies in wait for his victim, puts a knife to their throat, then goes violently at them? No. But is it still illegal and deserving to be punished? Yes.
Rape is forced sex. Perhaps we are confusing and older woman seducing a teenager with a priest and a young alter boy.
Amone other things, for biological reasons, it's impossible to rape a male. Something to do with elections. It a polital thing you see.
Do you folks know that some, if not many attempted rapes fail because the would be rapist can't get an election? My sister's sister in law avoided being raped because of that. That was during a homestead attack. A neighbor had the same thing. Intruder tried to rape her but couldn't get it up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indigo Cardinal
Uh, no. It's rape. Lemme tell you a lil' secret--17 year old girls have sexual fantasies too (speaking from personal experience here), and some of had young, male teachers who were attractive that we had crushes on. It would have been wrong for them to 'help us finish'. And it's wrong for a female teacher to help her male student 'finish'.
A child should not be touched sexually by an adult. Period. Now they trying to change the bar in different states or have old laws to determine the age of consent. Rape is not sex. It’s an act of violence. You are crossing the most intimate privacy a person can have. A child cannot agree to that - therefore it’s rape.
First, rape requires penetration so unless the women are sodomizing them it is not rape.
Statuary rape is false pretext for enforcing gender equality.
Boys going through puberty have sexual fantasies often, and they (I know this from experience) will also masturbate.
An older female teacher helping them finish is not rape. The boy who is consenting is not a victim of rape. The only trauma comes afterwards when the adults tell them they have been abused and need to be given council and forever embarrassed by the event.
We have now crossed a line where a 17 year old student having sex with a 22 year old teacher is classified as rape. Not only are we belittling real rape victims, we are handing out harsh sentences that are undeserved.
Boys are different from girls, switching the gender is changing the situation. But since we want to remove all gender barriers to allow for trans people to operate without restriction we now equalize something horrendous (a pedophile raping a child) with an adult women helping a horny boy reach a climax.
It is inappropriate and it should be a firable offense, but come on, stop this nonsense. It is getting way too extreme.
We have to use our brains as a country and stop falling over ourselves with this dumb nonsense.
Wow-
Trying to support and rationalize pedophilia; this is how democrats think and constantly try to normalize deviance and perversion.
A 17 year old is still a kid. A 22 year old is an adult; an adult having sex with a kid is statutory rape and is illegal. And yes- women can rape a male.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
