Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"The claim that state legislatures may have powers to intervene in disputed elections is not, in fact, a crackpot theory. The Electoral Count Act (E.C.A.) of 1877, an outdated federal law governing the Electoral College, contains a number of kludgy, untested provisions that future Republican opportunists might seek to exploit. In one passage, the law appears to authorize state legislatures to act in the case of a “failed” election."
"The claim that state legislatures may have powers to intervene in disputed elections is not, in fact, a crackpot theory. The Electoral Count Act (E.C.A.) of 1877, an outdated federal law governing the Electoral College, contains a number of kludgy, untested provisions that future Republican opportunists might seek to exploit. In one passage, the law appears to authorize state legislatures to act in the case of a “failed” election."
The Election was not a failed election. Only in Trump conspirators' minds. No court or elected body claimed it was "failed". Only the seditious conspirators have made that claim. That will not be a very good defense if charged.
The Election was not a failed election. Only in Trump conspirators' minds. No court or elected body claimed it was "failed". Only the seditious conspirators have made that claim. That will not be a very good defense if charged.
You still don't get it.
Last edited by CaseyB; 01-14-2022 at 04:01 PM..
Reason: off topic
"The claim that state legislatures may have powers to intervene in disputed elections is not, in fact, a crackpot theory. The Electoral Count Act (E.C.A.) of 1877, an outdated federal law governing the Electoral College, contains a number of kludgy, untested provisions that future Republican opportunists might seek to exploit. In one passage, the law appears to authorize state legislatures to act in the case of a “failed” election."
Only takes a grand jury to charge them likely a DC jury will charge them and convict them. Here in Arizona they were sent by local Republican party wasn't even signed by any elected official. When they are all arrested and cuffs slapped on they be crying for a plea deal. Examples need to be made of all the actors who were involved in the attempted overturning of a legal elections so this stunt isn't tried again.
They need to investigate everything- finally the coin has flipped.
Michigan’s attorney general is asking federal prosecutors to open a criminal investigation into 16 Republicans who submitted false certificates stating they were the state’s presidential electors despite Joe Biden’s 154,000-vote victory in 2020.
"The claim that state legislatures may have powers to intervene in disputed elections is not, in fact, a crackpot theory. The Electoral Count Act (E.C.A.) of 1877, an outdated federal law governing the Electoral College, contains a number of kludgy, untested provisions that future Republican opportunists might seek to exploit. In one passage, the law appears to authorize state legislatures to act in the case of a “failed” election."
A strict reading of the law makes it seem like the notary didn't break the law.
Quote:
Jurat notarizations are required for transactions where the signer must attest to the content of the document, such as all affidavits and pleadings in court. It is a certification on an affidavit declaring when, where and before whom it was sworn. However, jurat notarizations do not prove a document is true, legal, valid or enforceable.
In executing a jurat, a Notary guarantees that the signer:
personally appeared before the Notary
was positively identified using personal knowledge or satisfactory evidence
was given an oath or affirmation by the Notary attesting to the truthfulness of the document and
signed the document in the Notary's presence as the Notary is certifying that the signer attested to the truthfulness of the document contents under penalty of perjury
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
