Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-19-2022, 11:09 AM
 
4,195 posts, read 1,600,665 times
Reputation: 2183

Advertisements

all current reactors in use are old solid fuel reactors general electric makes all their money on manufacturing fuel pellets/rods....
about a decade ago individuals became interested in discarded research of alternative nuclear research and re-discovered thorium...
thorium cannot make nuclear bombs (except plain old dirty ones maybe) the advantage is being liquid it works in a wider temp range at basically low pressure and if the reaction fails it simply solidifies and stops....it doesn't need the huge containment pressure vessel


these folks have been likened to the computer hackers of the 1970s


family members of upper Chinese ccp were given free of charge ALL of existing research papers about a decade ago and we see start-ups in china as we speak..general electric is against all this thorium stuff as no money in it for them


the reactor actually naturally breaks down thorium to uranium 232 in about a month which i beleive the other waste products can be added as fuel... thorium has a few remaining issues such as use of corrosive materials but this is seen as solvable and maybe the Chinese already have
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-19-2022, 11:18 AM
 
23,974 posts, read 15,082,290 times
Reputation: 12952
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattCW View Post
What about it?

Have they been harmed?
The question is will they be harmed?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2022, 11:22 AM
 
23,974 posts, read 15,082,290 times
Reputation: 12952
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
A new place deep in the Utah mountains for the waste was built by W. Bush.

1 of the 1st things obama did was to CANCEL the opening of it.

The dems AGAIN wasting MILLIONS!
You might want to read up on how that happened. Nevada didn't want it at Yucca Mt. and Utah didn't want one either. The senators and a Utah governor made a deal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2022, 11:25 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
16,911 posts, read 10,591,580 times
Reputation: 16439
From what I understand there isn't that much of it. Just tether it to a rocket and fly it into the sun.
__________________
City Data TOS
Mod posts are in RED
Moderators for General Forums
Moderators for US and World Forums
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2022, 02:06 PM
 
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
2,014 posts, read 3,898,753 times
Reputation: 1725
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJJersey View Post
From what I understand there isn't that much of it. Just tether it to a rocket and fly it into the sun.
In brief. More than a quarter million metric tons of highly radioactive waste sits in storage near nuclear power plants and weapons production facilities worldwide, with over 90,000 metric tons in the US alone.

Hanford Nuclear Reservation has 56 million gallons of radioactive waste held in underground tanks and solid waste buried throughout the site. An additional 25 million cubic feet of solid radioactive waste, and areas of heavy technetium-99 and uranium contaminated groundwater beneath three tank farms on the site as well as the potential for future groundwater contamination beneath currently contaminated soils.

The sheer amount at Hanford alone is mind boggling and this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2022, 02:10 PM
 
Location: New York City
19,061 posts, read 12,720,048 times
Reputation: 14783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chefkey View Post
To all Pro Nuclear Energy Pundits, it's time to start realizing the still unproven ways to safely neutralize waste.


https://www.asahi.com/sp/ajw/articles/14503708
FYI Elon Musk is exponentially reducing the cost per ton of transportation into space every year. It will soon be relatively cheap to launch spent nuclear fuel into outer space on a SpaceX rocket
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2022, 07:06 PM
 
182 posts, read 331,839 times
Reputation: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chefkey View Post
In brief. More than a quarter million metric tons of highly radioactive waste sits in storage near nuclear power plants and weapons production facilities worldwide, with over 90,000 metric tons in the US alone.

Hanford Nuclear Reservation has 56 million gallons of radioactive waste held in underground tanks and solid waste buried throughout the site. An additional 25 million cubic feet of solid radioactive waste, and areas of heavy technetium-99 and uranium contaminated groundwater beneath three tank farms on the site as well as the potential for future groundwater contamination beneath currently contaminated soils.

The sheer amount at Hanford alone is mind boggling and this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Hanford waste is military was and has nothing to do with civilian nuclear power.

From: https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/5...t-nuclear-fuel

"...the U.S. has produced roughly 83,000 metrics tons of used fuel since the 1950s—and all of it could fit on a single football field at a depth of less than 10 yards."

Last edited by Nuke64; 01-19-2022 at 07:21 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2022, 07:08 PM
 
182 posts, read 331,839 times
Reputation: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
number one...revoke the Carter era rule that says we can NOT recycle the nuclear rods




[color=black]if we would reverse the Carter era law that says we can NOT recycle the nuclear rods
There is no Carter era law. Its was an executive order and Reagan overturned it. The economics don't make sense for reprocessing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2022, 07:19 PM
 
182 posts, read 331,839 times
Reputation: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chefkey View Post
To all Pro Nuclear Energy Pundits, it's time to start realizing the still unproven ways to safely neutralize waste.


https://www.asahi.com/sp/ajw/articles/14503708

This problem is unique to the Fukushima plant. This article goes in to more detail and discusses some of the solutions.

https://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/en/cat...etail_157.html

Generally, this stuff can be stored in stainless steel indefinitely. I think they are use the plastic containers as the storage in those containers is supposed to be sort and the slurry will be eventually dried out.

There are multiple solutions to used fuel from other plants, deep geologic storage or reprocessing. The issue is political.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2022, 07:32 PM
 
182 posts, read 331,839 times
Reputation: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chefkey View Post
notice how no one talks about the mutations downstream of a coolant tower in amphibians
Because there aren't any.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top