Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-26-2022, 09:29 AM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,102 posts, read 41,267,704 times
Reputation: 45136

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by clutchcargo777 View Post
CDC confirms that Comirnaty is not available in the US and that Pfizer-BioNTech and Comirnaty are distinct (different)

CDC Confirms Comirnaty NOT Available In USA, Meaning No FDA-Approved COVID Vax Is Available To Americans - National File
In other words, the only difference is the label and they are using up existing vaccine before distributing vials labelled Comirnaty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-26-2022, 09:34 AM
 
21,933 posts, read 9,503,108 times
Reputation: 19456
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Which JAMA study is that?
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2788346
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2022, 09:36 AM
 
8,151 posts, read 3,676,088 times
Reputation: 2718
Quote:
Originally Posted by clutchcargo777 View Post
CDC confirms that Comirnaty is not available in the US and that Pfizer-BioNTech and Comirnaty are distinct (different)

CDC Confirms Comirnaty NOT Available In USA, Meaning No FDA-Approved COVID Vax Is Available To Americans - National File

Chemically identical, currently no difference in liability (PREP act). But yes, they have different names so they are "legally different".

More details (p4, p5, p12, etc.):

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46913

Another conspiracy theory bites the dust.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2022, 09:39 AM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,102 posts, read 41,267,704 times
Reputation: 45136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grlzrl View Post
Do you realize how low those rates are?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2022, 09:40 AM
 
21,933 posts, read 9,503,108 times
Reputation: 19456
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
In other words, the only difference is the label and they are using up existing vaccine before distributing vials labelled Comirnaty.
They have been saying that for months. I heard about this in Aug when I got my vaxx.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2022, 09:41 AM
 
187 posts, read 68,275 times
Reputation: 137
What was the point for Pfizer to change the name/label of the vaccine? Why not just leave it alone?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2022, 09:42 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,381,866 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grlzrl View Post
I thought that was the one.

So, of the 192,405,448 people, 1626 VAERS claims met the case definition for myocarditis. So, even assuming that all 1626 cases were actually caused by the vaccine - that's a .000845% of having myocarditis as a side-effect (if my math is correct).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2022, 09:43 AM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,102 posts, read 41,267,704 times
Reputation: 45136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grlzrl View Post
They have been saying that for months. I heard about this in Aug when I got my vaxx.
What difference does it make? It is the same vaccine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2022, 09:43 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,381,866 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_modern_philosopher View Post
What was the point for Pfizer to change the name/label of the vaccine? Why not just leave it alone?
Marketing/advertising.

You can't legally market a drug until it is approved and "Comirnaty" fits on a pamphlet a lot easier than "the PFizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine".

Also - for a normal vaccine, FDA approval would make it subject to the VICP program, rather than the CICP program, regarding any injury claims. That doesn't apply to the COVID vaccines due to an exception made by the previous administration.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2022, 09:47 AM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,102 posts, read 41,267,704 times
Reputation: 45136
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_modern_philosopher View Post
What was the point for Pfizer to change the name/label of the vaccine? Why not just leave it alone?
The original name was the one used for trials. Cominarty is the brand name.

Here are brand names for other vaccines:

https://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/PREVEN...BrandNames.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:45 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top