Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-01-2022, 01:35 PM
 
Location: South Bay Native
16,225 posts, read 27,435,268 times
Reputation: 31495

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dicipher View Post
"we"?

I suspect if I ask 100 people, I'd get quite a few variations of who that "we" might be. Why this always has to be about a party never ceases to amaze me. Here's a novel concept, how about a President that's rational and understands he represents the entire nation instead of 50%? I guess that would rule out most of the current Presidents.
I don't think their president would actually represent their wishes, more like the the wishes of the wealthy elites. Wealthy elites don't want deportations or to end illegal immigration, because they are too busy profiting off the exploitation of their depressed wages. The Republicans who post here don't seem to get that they will never see their fortress America no matter how hardline conservative of a president they pick. He won't represent their needs if it conflicts with the expectations of the lizard people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-01-2022, 01:38 PM
 
Location: moved
13,656 posts, read 9,717,813 times
Reputation: 23481
Number one - and this is sure to offend the "States' rights" advocates here - would be a vigorous federal law stripping state/local officials of emergency powers. A corollary would be ending the masking/distancing mandates. Also, reconstitute OSHA, from being a nanny-agency to an employee-rights agency. That means a federal ban on employers' private ability to impose mask mandates or covid testing-mandates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2022, 06:05 PM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,670,668 times
Reputation: 20885
Quote:
Originally Posted by DontH8Me View Post
I don't think their president would actually represent their wishes, more like the the wishes of the wealthy elites. Wealthy elites don't want deportations or to end illegal immigration, because they are too busy profiting off the exploitation of their depressed wages. The Republicans who post here don't seem to get that they will never see their fortress America no matter how hardline conservative of a president they pick. He won't represent their needs if it conflicts with the expectations of the lizard people.
?????????????????


The democrats are the party of the wealth elites and the oligarchs, not the republicans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top