Quote:
Originally Posted by dicipher
"we"?
I suspect if I ask 100 people, I'd get quite a few variations of who that "we" might be. Why this always has to be about a party never ceases to amaze me. Here's a novel concept, how about a President that's rational and understands he represents the entire nation instead of 50%? I guess that would rule out most of the current Presidents.
|
I don't think their president would actually represent their wishes, more like the the wishes of the wealthy elites. Wealthy elites don't want deportations or to end illegal immigration, because they are too busy profiting off the exploitation of their depressed wages. The Republicans who post here don't seem to get that they will never see their fortress America no matter how hardline conservative of a president they pick. He won't represent their needs if it conflicts with the expectations of the lizard people.