Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I am not challenging that view at all, but I am curious if it is something that begs a response in the way of government legislation to counter.
If those white folk are freely choosing to baby their kids that's just the way the cookie crumbles, right?
Maybe they'll end up as scientists or some wall street coke head?
Think of it like this, how many Black people are in Bull riding? Bowling? Golf? Tennis? Snowboarding? Sailing? Rowing?
If I were to support a Government program for white folk to get into football, then I would likely have to do the same for Black folk and the sports above. I see no reason government should involve themselves in this. If discrimination is found against a organization involving sports then we can use the laws currently on the books.
But you cannot force people to want to do certain sports, live in a specific region to do a sport as a kid, or make it affordable to do such as Go Kart racing which is the the gate keeper for most Auto Racing careers.
If you don't know someone with a horse then its hard to do horse back riding competitions. Same goes for boxing and White folk or anyone really, its hard to learn to box when there are no boxing gyms in your neighborhoods or suburbs.
Edgy reply, but zero contribution to the conversation. That all you got?
How about an edgier response.
If "woke" and "liberal" and all that stuff makes people lazy and stupid and beta. How come you white conservatives can't beat these black guys out at cornerback?
Status:
"Moldy Tater Gangrene, even before Moscow Marge."
(set 3 days ago)
Location: Dallas, TX
5,790 posts, read 3,600,682 times
Reputation: 5697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cape Cod Todd
You do not have to be a member of a minority to be marginalized because the Democrats will put you in a category that fits their identity politics. The most disliked group right now are white males but if you are gay, trans or a pajama boy activist for social justice then you can be part of their team and be marginalized to your hearts content.
Actually, the most disrespected (if not disliked, very little relevant difference) groups right now are legion:
"Unmanly" men (aka, "soyboys"), the nonassertive ("wimps" and more vulgar synonyms), the socially awkward, the emotionally sensitive or damaged, the cognitively incompetent ("stupid"), involuntarily celibates even if not Incels (TM). Plus the poor, vocationally incompetent, the mentally ill (even just figuratively so -- "weirdo", "psycho", etc.).
Here's a hint: Think about the types of people people tend to talk down about most frequently. Then think about why they're looked down upon. Whatever answer you come up with is most likely the type of person society needs to stop being judgemental against.
If "woke" and "liberal" and all that stuff makes people lazy and stupid and beta. How come you white conservatives can't beat these black guys out at cornerback?
Wow, that's not an edgy response - that's a stupid and WAY-off-topic response LOL. Please point out where I *ever* said woke/liberal equals lazy/stupid/beta? Other than your reply, I haven't seen any indication of it.
Thanks for the laugh
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
