Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There is a simple explanation, people who genuinely don't want a vaccine (and perhaps have underlying medical reasons for it) will go with the easiest option. A philosophical exemption. A philosophical exemption doesn't require a doctor's appointment, just to check a box, and state a reason.
When California removed that, all of them turned to doctor's for medical reasons, some of them got it. We're told by the left to trust your PCP, so it's asinine you're insinuating their PCP is lying.
Perhaps? Lol.
So, for a doctor to sign a 1000 exemptions, how many patients does the doctor have in the first place? Lol.
Everyone (Serger and company) who advocate removing philosophical and religious exemptions as well as tightening medical exemptions should be specially taxed, and then from that fund we can pay the vaccine injured.
So, for a doctor to sign a 1000 exemptions, how many patients does the doctor have in the first place? Lol.
Many doctors in a HMO system can have thousands, if not tens of thousands. They see them 15 minutes at a time, sometimes not even that. And not every year.
Everyone (Serger and company) who advocate removing philosophical and religious exemptions as well as tightening medical exemptions should be specially taxed, and then from that fund we can pay the vaccine injured.
Look, genius, this lengthy exchange started, when somebody else stated that CA does not allow exemptions (as in any). That statement was false. I also pointed to the fact the number of medical exemptions increased multifold after the CA law was changed. Then there was a side discussion about investigations. That's all.
Many doctors in a HMO system can have thousands, if not tens of thousands. They see them 15 minutes at a time, sometimes not even that. And not every year.
Everyone (Serger and company) who advocate removing philosophical and religious exemptions as well as tightening medical exemptions should be specially taxed, and then from that fund we can pay the vaccine injured.
Or they could just get rid of them.
I think people are so brainwashed that they literally cannot comprehend a world where people are permitted to make their own medical decisions.
If you want a treatment? Go get it. If you don't, then don't.
Why is that such a *radical* idea? Why is that idea so *threatening*?
Why do children need to be forced to get medication? Why is there a push to now force adults to get medication? Why?
Look, genius, this lengthy exchange started, when somebody else stated that CA does not allow exemptions (as in any). That statement was false. I also pointed to the fact the number of medical exemptions increased multifold after the CA law was changed. Then there was a side discussion about investigations. That's all.
Oh yes, the "multifold" increase was 0.3% of enrolled students to 0.9% of enrolled students getting a medical exemption.
Since you want to take things "literally" then yes technically California does allow Medical Exemptions. But will you then agree with what has been pointed out to you by several people?
That the State has made the process of getting a Medical Exemption, almost impossible. That they have pressured doctors to the point that it is practically a crime to write a medical exemption. Because of these actions, there are people that would actually qualify for an exemption but are not given one. This is more rhetorical as I can likely predict the response, but figured I would ask anyways.
Oh yes, the "multifold" increase was 0.3% of enrolled students to 0.9% of enrolled students getting a medical exemption.
Since you want to take things "literally" then yes technically California does allow Medical Exemptions. But will you then agree with what has been pointed out to you by several people?
That the State has made the process of getting a Medical Exemption, almost impossible. That they have pressured doctors to the point that it is practically a crime to write a medical exemption. Because of these actions, there are people that would actually qualify for an exemption but are not given one. This is more rhetorical as I can likely predict the response, but figured I would ask anyways.
Schools also must keep a 95% immunization rate or they also get investigated. So even if a parent is able to get one, the school may deny it.
To keep them above the 95% mark.
Pretending like medical exemptions are being handed out like drive-up vaccines, is dishonest. Oh, and also false.
Schools also must keep a 95% immunization rate or they also get investigated. So even if a parent is able to get one, the school may deny it.
To keep them above the 95% mark.
Pretending like medical exemptions are being handed out like drive-up vaccines, is dishonest. Oh, and also false.
Yep..that is the other side of the coin that hasn't really been touched upon, and again the State controls. Once you go through all of the efforts the school could still say that it is not accepted and you are practically back at square one.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
