Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Love the deflection. When are you going to get him now, and since it’s almost been 5 years of the goosechase turning up zilch, please be specific on time? Another 5 years?
What deflection?
Your airquote ‘legal argument’ rests on your feelings (feelings woo who feelings) that Mr Trump’s longtime accounting firm states that no one, including Mr Trumps’s lenders, should rely on financial statements submitted by Mr Trump?
& should be the basis of exonerating Mr Trump? That he & his collaborators should not have to answer?
Yep, that’s all you’ve got, hurt feelings. Seriously though, it’s been almost 5 years of obsession with trying to “get him”, and it can’t be healthy, especially since not getting him is going to continue.
Your airquote ‘legal argument’ rests on your feelings (feelings woo who feelings) that Mr Trump’s longtime accounting firm states that no one, including Mr Trumps’s lenders, should rely on financial statements submitted by Mr Trump?
& should be the basis of exonerating Mr Trump? That he & his collaborators should not have to answer?
That “is as audacious as it is preposterous.”
Lol at even more deflection.
Instead of answering the questions you keep deflecting. Why won’t you answer the question of when you’re going to get him? Will it be another 5 years of trying?
Donald Trump's accountants have informed the Trump Organization that 10 years' worth of the former president's financial statements can no longer be relied upon -- and instructed his company to tell all of his lenders the same.
Quote:
"We have come to this conclusion based, in part, upon the filings made by the New York Attorney General on January 18, 2022, our own investigation, and information received from internal and external sources," Mazars general counsel William Kelly wrote.
Quote:
"While we have not concluded that the various financial statements, as a whole, contain material discrepancies, based on the totality of the circumstances, we believe our advice to you to no longer rely upon those financial statements is appropriate."
So basically former president's accountant is saying that because they discovered discrepancies in his financial statements, they won't vouch for their validity?
Lol. You’ve never provided any to find out. Just feelings and angst.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
