Durham vs Mueller probes: What's the difference? (FBI, regime, conspiracy)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,413 posts, read 12,470,991 times
Reputation: 10415
Quote:
Originally Posted by VA Yankee
What are you talking about, did you miss the part where I thanked you for the link and quoted paragraphs from it? I don't have to like Fox as a journalistic source and when available will choose something else but you were the only one to provide a link that explains how Durham is allowed to continue, ok..
okay.
fwiw, the Fox story was the first one on the search results. If it had been a left media then I would have linked that, though it seems left media is not really too interested in the story for some strange reason.
I see you're good with what he'd lied about regarding Iraq.
As for your question, why don't we first wait to see if Mueller's report is based on truthful evidence or fabricated evidence.
Didn’t say a thing about Iraq. That was your attempt at distraction. Hawkeye said the President was found innocent. Since you decided to respond, by whom?
The democrats contended THAT TRUMP WAS A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY. How many times did they say that? As it turns out, HILLARY, THE DNC, AND OBAMA ARE A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY.
So much nonsense there, but I will respond to this.
Who told a mob to go to the capital? And told them to fight?
Yeah. We ALL watched it.
Heres 45 minutes of it if you haven't seen the violence or think it was peaceful (viewer discretion is advised. LITERALLY):
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,413 posts, read 12,470,991 times
Reputation: 10415
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeorgiaTransplant
Didn’t say a thing about Iraq. That was your attempt at distraction. Hawkeye said the President was found innocent. Since you decided to respond, by whom?
So you want to try to score points over something that Meuller said, when it's unknown at this time if what he'd said is based on truth or fabrication? Fine, you win, he never said Trump was innocent. He might have been telling the truth, he might have been misled, or he might have been lying(like with Iraq). Does this settle it for you and are you happy now?
Find your right wing friend thats in IT. Ask him to read JUST the filings. Then ask his opinion.
DNS monitoring is not spying. There are massive troves of this data that you can buy, or if you are the customer can hire someone to examine for you. Since you know....most folks arent experts at DNS monitoring. Which the government did in 2014. BTW IF your friend IS good at IT send them this link from back then which is a good overview of some of the discussions around this at a technical level, and includes links to what is purported to be the data. As they point out you cannot rely on this as its not from a original source. Original source data is available from companies and network logs. Id put it at near 100% the CIA can provide it as well as that would be a vital intelligence tool, and defensive tool in the event of a war with almost any opponent so perhaps the DOD as well.
The government paid DNS monitoring data from the White House is to be shared to government agencies only. Not the Clinton campaign or any member of the Clinton Klan, especially when money is involved, for such purposes of political blackmail or political gain.
They most certainly are embarrassed that Trump was Right.. Again. I wonder how many from the Left that basically called him a liar and worse will issue an apology to him? Cue the crickets...
When you think about it, why did it take 3+ years to investigate the Russian Collusion? Mueller had a crack team of Democrat appointees that overturned every rock looking for dirt. They were actually looking for evidence to support their accusations of a crime.
They all knew as an absolute fact that Trump was guilty and they only needed to find that smoking gun before the "walls closed in". It was all great theater and the Left ate it up. The "investigation" drove their ratings and sold lots of books.
What is so bad about the Truth that they think we cannot handle it? Of course everything the Dems do they do for political reasons to give themselves power. Lies deceit and scandal are just tools for them to gain power and hold sway over their minions.
Mueller was allowed to do his work and now Durham should be given everything he needs to do his. We deserve the truth.
This was the major Election interference of 2020, all lies.
Not worthy of comparison. Can note differences but in no way comparable on any level.
Mueller was a face used to give credibility to a host of Trump haters, the lead attorney had been admonished in his career for ithholding excuplatory evidence. The committee was a kangaroo court. Like Schiffs and then Nadlers and pelosi's insurrection hearing.... nothing but rigged hang em high courts allowed to persist by the media.
Durham was sanctioned by the DOJ of the past and present and has evidence that meets legal standards.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
