Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As a public figure for the last several decades she knows already that it goes with the territory and its not worth wasting time on, Trumps has yet to learn that lesson.
Whether she is guilty or innocent, nothing wrong for her to keep quiet. As long as she's wearing that diaper on her face outside is all that matters in this situation. She knew reporters were waiting for her at the door.
Well when you consider that not being in lockstep with every bit of right wing wackery make one a Marxist these days...
You are probably right.
You've got your Stalin, I've got my George Washington.......I'm center right, not far right by a long shot. A registered independent....I'm your average run of the mill American.
An innocent person would be indignant about the accusations and respond with a curt, short reply.
Think about how YOU would respond if you were accused of a crime you did not commit.
So if Hillary is innocent, why doesn't she sue Durham for slander/libel? After all, if what he is saying is not true and completely fabricated, it would be an easy case. Why not?
Durham did not make the accusations you claim. Why would Mrs. Clinton respond to something that is alternative reality on Trump TV?
5 threads on this forum twisting the truth of a Durham filing from last week? A filing that contained no new information, was not an indictment and alleged no criminal conduct. A filing that relates to a conflict-of-interest matter against someone who once worked at the law firm which represents the Democratic National Committee?
Geez you Donald desperados don't seem to get it...Durham's own words and this filing make no claim of spying or provide any evidence of it...these asinine assertions and MAGA mendacities are beginning to smell like just another distraction to assist the disgraced and defeated former guy avoid accountability for genuine criminal activity.
You will never get a straight answer out of Crooked Hillary.
a) she's essentially a politician, and a Democrat, and they generally don't give straight answers
b) she would never just come right out and say "yeah, we spied on Trump. What about it?"
c) they don't call her Crooked Hillary for nothing
Durham did not make the accusations you claim. Why would Mrs. Clinton respond to something that is alternative reality on Trump TV?
5 threads on this forum twisting the truth of a Durham filing from last week? A filing that contained no new information, was not an indictment and alleged no criminal conduct. A filing that relates to a conflict-of-interest matter against someone who once worked at the law firm which represents the Democratic National Committee?
Geez you Donald desperados don't seem to get it...Durham's own words and this filing make no claim of spying or provide any evidence of it...these asinine assertions and MAGA mendacities are beginning to smell like just another distraction to assist the disgraced and defeated former guy avoid accountability for genuine criminal activity.
How in hell does news get filtered on your planet?
She could just be thoroughly hammered and can't talk.
Nothing against the law or unethical about that.
Good for her if she is having some fun.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
