Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They won't need to. Chernobyl is starting to become increasingly dangerous because the power's been disconnected and the radioactive materials stored in pools of water are starting to overheat. Plus the Russian occupiers haven't allowed the crew to be relieved since they took over the plant about two weeks ago. It could very well go critical again, especially if the Russians decide it's a loosing battle for them and do a scorched earth exit operation.
Retreat and scorched earth will only make their economic situation worse. Russia will be a pariah for decades.
Did we (USA) do that thing in Bosnia too in c. 1999 (destroy a hospital)?
Do you have any idea how many civilian targets the US has destroyed in their "war on terror" (ironic since the terrorist entity is actually the US military) and other military actions? It is countless and I certainly cant name all of them and you better believe that the US doesnt tell you about them unless someone is leaking the information.
Remember what happened to Snowden for exposing some of the horrible stuff that the US government has done.
Yah sure. put it together any way you want to. And yes he did. Because he sold out to Russia years ago. What was his very first decision as POTUS?
What's stopping Poland, or any other NATO country, from sending their own jets? NATO doesn't need the permission of America or Biden to send Ukraine jets.
Even some people from Belarus want to help stop Putin's killings. I can't imagine the fate they would face if they are captured. These are very brave people.
What's stopping Poland, or any other NATO country, from sending their own jets? NATO doesn't need the permission of America or Biden to send Ukraine jets.
It would be nice if some other country was the most likely target than the US so I dont have to check out nukemap to see how likely I would be vaporized in a nuclear attack.
I know people say Trump wanted out of NATO and I personally believe that being in NATO is a terrible idea. Look at the current situation, who is most likely to get the nuke in their country? It is a failure of every President to have kept the US in NATO and kept the US as the number one target. But that was also for a good reason since military spending is how so many politicians bread is buttered.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
