Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hawley was very unconvincing as was Cruz, just sticking to the soft on crime nonsense.
Totally agree. Oh gosh you are correct. That was Cotton that went all bogus child porn wasn't it? I've confused him with Hawley by appearance, before. Thanks. In any event, the Republicans have no legitimate reason to oppose her, as evidenced by the bizarre line of questioning from their grandstanders.
These GOP senators' political theatrics, although predictable, was certainly embarrassing for them. The next justice to be seated on the Supreme Court showed us why she is an excellent selection as she batted down--- with poise, intellect and grace--- all those fraudulent allegations from the whiny Republicans on that committee.
Clearly they were campaigning and appealing to their targeted base audience, and of course that kind of stuff resonates with the ignorant, but as far as the rest of America goes, it came off as patently cruel & dishonest smear and deceitful partisan assault. I think they hurt themselves and the GOP in the process....and that in my book is a good thing!
Last edited by corpgypsy; 03-23-2022 at 01:21 PM..
Did she ever sentence someone for longer than the sentencing guidelines called for? I doubt it and that says it all.
Only if you assume the guidelines are correct. Apparently, the Supremes already ruled they weren't and issued some decision that allows judges more discretion.
Naturally the cards are being shown. Righties harping on judicial sentencing /procedure, abortion, 2nd amendment.
Lefties being more inquisitive of
Her qualifications - education , rulings and her contributions to the courts thru out her career.
How are the subjects that Republicans are harping on not relevant to rulings and contributions to the court?
Blackburn Could have asked her a million good questions on the law but instead asks her to define woman, Blackburn isn’t exactly a Mensa.
Doesn't really matter. When it comes election time, the video of her claiming she doesn't know what a woman is will play in the voting publics mind that Democrats can't even draw a distinction between a man and a woman I think the vast majority of the country actually know the difference between a man and woman, and they won't agree with another Democrat Ideologue
You can't make accusations out of NOTHING. You have to have someone who is standing there making them, and willing to testify.
Really? Christine Blasey Ford made accusations out of NOTHING. She couldn't remember ANY specific details of the incident, yet the Democratic Party crucified Justice Kavanaugh for it.
Only if you assume the guidelines are correct. Apparently, the Supremes already ruled they weren't and issued some decision that allows judges more discretion.
Why didn't she come out and say that as her defense ?
We're on Judge Jackson in this thread. You have any comments on the present hearings?
Yes, reread what I wrote. The Ms. Brown hearings are night and day compared to what the demolibs did to the republicans and my comments have everything to do with that! WTF!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think the vast majority of the country actually know the difference between a man and woman, and they won't agree with another Democrat Ideologue
