Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
In simplest natural terms the woman produces eggs a man produces living sperm That live in the eggs.
In corrupted terms men have screwed up the system so that there are all kinds of variations , but from the beginning it was not so. The dog in its Purest form is a wolf , man have domesticated dog and alter it’s form so it isn’t what was originally .
the same with horses cows many other animals , men have modified through playing with genetics the same with many diseases that are that exist now never existed before except the man interfered so I agree that due to corruption there are confused sexes , it is unlikely that I will go back.
Any of you looney toons that try to rationalize this nonsense are obviously just as screwy as these gender confused knuckleheads. Playing the intelligence card by trying to outsmart the non crazy people by asking for outrageous scientific hoo ha definition of who is what and what is who.
Boys have a penis. Girls have a vagina. Born that way. It’s that simple. That is the “science”.
Exactly this. The Republicans want to turn this hearing another front in their culture wars. They are competing for soundbytes on Fox. These questions have nothing to do with her qualifications as a judge on the Supreme Court.
Right........it's not even the question to be answered.
If they wanted to go down this path they could have asked her what she thought the courts role is with regards to issues surrounding transgendered people in society or something similar.
How she answered critical questions with NON ANSWERS shows she is exactly a Partisan, Leftist Activist judge with no respect for the highest law of the land. The Constitution. She is totally unqualified.
Did you say that when Barrett refused to be pinned down on Roe v Wade? I doubt it.
I believe that there are agitator accounts, so to speak. That account is one. IMO. YMMV. It takes every possible nonsensical viewpoint and makes it even more of a farce. Quite stunning, actually.
These are the ones who tout gender is a social construct. They're seriously unhinged.
Some parts of gender expression are a social construct.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
