Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Socialism Vs. Capitalism
Capitalism 45 56.25%
Socialism 8 10.00%
Not Mutually Exclusive 27 33.75%
Voters: 80. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-22-2008, 04:49 PM
 
532 posts, read 859,122 times
Reputation: 128

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie117 View Post
One of the great debates of our time.

I for one don't think they are mutually exclusive. But I would like to see how others feel about the issue.
Our government wants us to be Socialists--while they are Capitalistic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-22-2008, 05:50 PM
 
Location: Central CT, sometimes FL and NH.
4,538 posts, read 6,799,572 times
Reputation: 5985
Representative democracy is our form of government. That with capitalism is kind of a ying and yang relationship.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2008, 07:02 PM
 
11,944 posts, read 14,780,145 times
Reputation: 2772
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhouse2001 View Post
Quite interesting reading, but I wonder..to what end? The system of governments around the world are all doomed to fail as they are inherently self-destructive. Arguing whether one system is better than another while still assuming the future will be like the past is not a good exercise. When the excrement hits the fan and we are left to fend for ourselves--you know it's coming--what system will we use? We will barter with each other, we will collectivize what needs to be owned by the community, and we will be forced to work together because there will be no other option. Capitalism is the exact opposite of this. Communism (as in the aloof Soviet version) can't be employed because no large social structure will exist. A spectrum of varying degrees of socialism spread across small regions comprising of perhaps a 1000 people will probably be the way to go forward. Large government and human/resource exploitation have no place in the future if we are to survive as a species.
To what end... Indeed!
I'm getting the idea that the spectrum of degrees of socialism will wind up being how international relations, human rights mgmt, and trade agreements will be solved on equal footing once and for all. I'm not willing to part with the constitution, however. I think it's very wise. I consider myself responsible with my liberties so it's worked well for me. Others not so well.

I just can't picture it being 1,000 people in millions of discreet groups though. Any idea what a maximum size gov't efficiency is, or is that how you came up with 1,000? I recall reading a book about ideal company sizes due to human efficiency networks & 6 degrees of separation, but I'll be damned if I can recall the title.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2008, 07:19 PM
 
4,410 posts, read 6,137,563 times
Reputation: 2908
Quote:
Originally Posted by harborlady View Post
To what end... Indeed!
I'm getting the idea that the spectrum of degrees of socialism will wind up being how international relations, human rights mgmt, and trade agreements will be solved on equal footing once and for all. I'm not willing to part with the constitution, however. I think it's very wise. I consider myself responsible with my liberties so it's worked well for me. Others not so well.

I just can't picture it being 1,000 people in millions of discreet groups though. Any idea what a maximum size gov't efficiency is, or is that how you came up with 1,000? I recall reading a book about ideal company sizes due to human efficiency networks & 6 degrees of separation, but I'll be damned if I can recall the title.
My estimate of a thousand was just a guess. There might be some magical number beyond which a group experiences entropy and fails, but I still envision the future as a collection of small local groups of like-minded individuals. Some groups will succeed more than others. Some groups will end up killing themselves. However, reducing things to a common denominator like something akin to socialism (with a Constitution of some sort) is the best course of action in my opinion.

When you get up high enough, you can't see borders or countries. It's just one planet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2008, 07:23 PM
 
11,944 posts, read 14,780,145 times
Reputation: 2772
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lincolnian View Post
Representative democracy is our form of government. That with capitalism is kind of a ying and yang relationship.
Yes Linc, but capitalism doesnt govern people, only allows a basis for economic structure. The law of the land has to be supreme or capitalism canibalizes. The yin/yang gets off kilter when business is over regulated or under regulated. All comes down to finding that right setting where gov't maintains it's responsibility for guarding public trust, and knowing when to stay the heck out of it's own way. Not unlike the solar system orchestrated orbits, pull one side too much, it gets messy.

As socialism goes, keeps everything on a nice even keel (aka malaise by some) with modest investment returns like 3% appreciation on a home per yr. across the board. Nobody starves, nobody has an excuse for stealing bread, and nobody gets ignored in a job market because Dr's are arbitrarily worth less than rocketscientists by the fads of commerce values excercising excess influence over people.

I'd hate to have 'the feds' job! What a thankless task that must be! And the WHINING! OY!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2008, 07:29 PM
 
11,944 posts, read 14,780,145 times
Reputation: 2772
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhouse2001 View Post
reducing things to a common denominator like something akin to socialism (with a Constitution of some sort) is the best course of action in my opinion.

When you get up high enough, you can't see borders or countries. It's just one planet.
I didn't have to be on the moon to see that, I've just traveled so much and went with appreciation for every culture/social strata I visited. They each gave me the gift of their best thoughts, which has made me wealthy in a way that the IRS can't tax yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2008, 07:45 PM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,254,467 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhouse2001 View Post
When you get up high enough, you can't see borders or countries. It's just one planet.
Do you support a "One World Government" concept?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2008, 11:38 PM
 
4,410 posts, read 6,137,563 times
Reputation: 2908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
Do you support a "One World Government" concept?
No I don't. There is no need for government. There is no need for the police or a military. As the universe is already ordered, there's no need for imposing control on anything. Right now we ARE tremendously imbalanced and the move toward balance will be met with opposition and resistance. Too bad. Everything in the universe is held accountable eventually.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2008, 11:48 PM
 
4,410 posts, read 6,137,563 times
Reputation: 2908
Quote:
Originally Posted by One Thousand View Post
Since the body dies, should we disregard good nutrition?
You are equating an economy with a living being? A country is not an economy. An economy is a man-made construct, a set of "agreements" that are basically forced on us. I see no reason to feed such a beast knowing its ravenous appetite and penchant for cannibalism.

Quote:
Actually, you are wrong. You have described the manifestation of capitalism perfectly.
I see your point, but I don't think capitalism is worth repeating. I know I will play no part in recreating it. The competition inherent in capitalism presupposes that resources are finite and must be fought over. Capitalism is based on fear and savagely exploits any and all resources.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2008, 12:18 AM
 
11,944 posts, read 14,780,145 times
Reputation: 2772
I don't think human beings have evolved enough to be without a government structure. I don't know that we ever will if we keep getting pulled backwards with people who have no self discipline.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top