Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-30-2022, 04:26 AM
 
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
2,912 posts, read 1,248,946 times
Reputation: 4314

Advertisements

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz........now we've got him..........zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..................... ..

 
Old 03-30-2022, 05:35 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,174 posts, read 19,200,869 times
Reputation: 14898
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
That's a bit hyperbolic at this point, don't you think? Did you actually read the article you posted?

Here's every relevant piece of information from the article. Most of the rest of it is just framing and the balance is speculation.

1. An anonymous source claimed that there are no calls logged for a period of hours after Trump's speech.

2. "It was widely reported" (they wrote this without providing citations) that Trump had/made phone calls during that period.

That's it. That's the only substantive information in the article. Let's have a look at it.

Number 1 is a single, unnamed source. There's zero credibility there. In the olden days of journalism, like five or six years ago, an organization wouldn't run with a story unless and until they could get three independent confirmations of it. Now, a single anonymous source is apparently enough. Anyway, the person isn't named and there's only one of them, so it's meaningless unless the story develops further.

Number 2 almost didn't even make the list. The only reason I included it was because they named specific individuals with claims that those people described conversations they had with the president. They didn't cite any of the specific information, though. Lazy.

Most propaganda is built upon a kernel of truth. Regardless of what happens with this, at this stage, nobody actually knows anything. We don't even know if the anonymous source is real. That's how little we actually know about this. It wouldn't be the first time that sources were faked to make up a story, either.
It is hyperbolic. Nixon was a small timer compared ho the would-be crooks around Trump.
 
Old 03-30-2022, 11:56 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
3,730 posts, read 1,320,791 times
Reputation: 3486
Quote:
Originally Posted by atxcio View Post
We wish it were like Nixon. Back then the GOP had a backbone and some decency and demanded a resignation.

Now they are weak. They are afraid of Trump supporters. Doesn’t matter if he broke the law, lied and covered it up.



That's because we had actual evidence all pointing back to Nixon, all while he denied it until he couldn't push himself further in the corner he was backed into.


Your emotional outrage and media stories that go nowhere (just like this one will) doesn't count as hard evidence.
 
Old 03-30-2022, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
3,730 posts, read 1,320,791 times
Reputation: 3486
Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
You couldn’t handle the truth…

Sounds like that would be you.
 
Old 03-30-2022, 12:16 PM
 
8,131 posts, read 4,328,096 times
Reputation: 4683
The 7 hours missing from WH phone log reminds me of Nixon's 18-minute tape gap. The evidence that the Jan. 6 commission is seeking, has been deleted.
 
Old 03-30-2022, 02:36 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,174 posts, read 19,200,869 times
Reputation: 14898
Quote:
Originally Posted by tillman7 View Post
The 7 hours missing from WH phone log reminds me of Nixon's 18-minute tape gap. The evidence that the Jan. 6 commission is seeking, has been deleted.
It’s nice t nearly as easy to delete digital data. There are two sides to the record.
 
Old 03-30-2022, 03:19 PM
 
6,343 posts, read 2,897,107 times
Reputation: 7281
Yeah right. Good one. I bet he was on the phone with Putin that entire time...
 
Old 03-30-2022, 06:46 PM
 
Location: Southeast US
8,609 posts, read 2,308,232 times
Reputation: 2114
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeorgiaTransplant View Post
He doesn't know what a burner phone is? He filed a lawsuit in 2021 where he references a burner phone on pages 3 and 10:

Trump v. Trump, 2021-53963, Supreme Court of the State of New York (Dutchess County)

"All the while, the parties knew full well that their actions were wrongful, as evidenced by their insistence on communicating through "burner" phones"

"At or around that time, Craig provided Mary Trump with a "burner" phone in an attempt to conceal their communications."

"Craig chose to use a "burner" phone"



100% he's lying. I really don't know why any of his acolytes trust him. He could tell you the sky is blue and the sun is hot, and at this point I'd probably think he was lying.
has he said in 2021 he didn't know what burner phones were?

did he write that language in the lawsuit, or an attorney did?

There are 1000's of 60+ year old government officials that don't know what a burner phone is, and of those that do, half should be investigated for using them.
 
Old 03-30-2022, 08:17 PM
 
3,072 posts, read 1,301,505 times
Reputation: 1755
Dems continuing to pursue this in an election year where they’re already going to get their faces biatch slapped makes zero sense. Someone should tell them it’s probably best not to fire up the opposing side even more than they already are
 
Old 03-31-2022, 07:00 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,381,866 times
Reputation: 10467
...The number corresponds to an official White House phone and the call was placed by Donald Trump himself, which means the call should have been recorded in the internal presidential call log that was turned over to the House select committee investigating the Capitol attack.
Trump’s call to Lee was reported at the time, as well as its omission from the call log, by the Washington Post and CBS. But the origin of the call as coming from an official White House phone, which has not been previously reported, raises the prospect of tampering or deletion by Trump White House officials
...

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...t-official-log
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top