Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 04-06-2022, 01:30 PM
 
8,425 posts, read 12,185,391 times
Reputation: 4882

Advertisements

NJ Senator Corey Booker on Monday stated what was obvious to many observers -- the Republicans on the Judiciary Committee used the hearings as to Judge Jackson more to air grievances than to discuss her qualifications for the appointment. Whining about what happened with Kavanaugh and Barrett is not discussing Jackson.

Notably, he asked: "How qualified must a person be?" No one has creditably stated that Judge Jackson with her training, experience and education is unqualified. What the senators did not state is that Judge Jackson rulings and sentencings had been well inside the norms for judicial action. Remarkably, 70 to 80% of judges go below sentencing guidelines but the Republicans had confirmed Republican judges that did so but now questioned Jackson about her record.

As to the hearing:
Quote:
Democrats did not query Republican nominees about their views on theories of race or about how other justices’ hearings were handled. When Democrats did not believe some of Kavanaugh’s testimony, they did not call him a liar. These courtesies were not extended to Jackson.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...brown-jackson/

He has some good points. The Republicans on the Judiciary Committee should be ashamed of how they conducted themselves during he hearings.

 
Old 04-06-2022, 01:33 PM
 
1,952 posts, read 829,020 times
Reputation: 2670
This pails in comparison to the sh*t show of that blonde doctor with the squeaky voice that could not remember when Kavanaugh raped her.


...give me a break
 
Old 04-06-2022, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Maryland
7,814 posts, read 6,392,163 times
Reputation: 9974
They were too cordial and easy on her and they need to get payback. They should have found someone from her past to fabricate stuff, but they’re too scared to be called racist.
 
Old 04-06-2022, 01:34 PM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,094 posts, read 18,269,535 times
Reputation: 34972
Compared to what they did to Kavanaugh the Repubs went easy on her.
 
Old 04-06-2022, 01:44 PM
 
8,425 posts, read 12,185,391 times
Reputation: 4882
Comparisons will never be settled. The question is if Republicans acted correctly in the current hearings. It certainly appears that they did not.
 
Old 04-06-2022, 01:49 PM
 
Location: Boston
20,102 posts, read 9,018,880 times
Reputation: 18759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manigault View Post
NJ Senator Corey Booker on Monday stated what was obvious to many observers -- the Republicans on the Judiciary Committee used the hearings as to Judge Jackson more to air grievances than to discuss her qualifications for the appointment. Whining about what happened with Kavanaugh and Barrett is not discussing Jackson.

Notably, he asked: "How qualified must a person be?" No one has creditably stated that Judge Jackson with her training, experience and education is unqualified. What the senators did not state is that Judge Jackson rulings and sentencings had been well inside the norms for judicial action. Remarkably, 70 to 80% of judges go below sentencing guidelines but the Republicans had confirmed Republican judges that did so but now questioned Jackson about her record.

As to the hearing: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...brown-jackson/

He has some good points. The Republicans on the Judiciary Committee should be ashamed of how they conducted themselves during he hearings.
Repubs remind me of the Dems on the Judiciary Committee during the past three hearing for SC Justices.
 
Old 04-06-2022, 01:56 PM
 
13,955 posts, read 5,625,642 times
Reputation: 8614
Republicans didn't come anywhere near what Dems did to Thomas, Bork, Rogers-Brown, Estrada, Owens or Kavanaugh.

Cry me a river.
 
Old 04-06-2022, 01:56 PM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,094 posts, read 18,269,535 times
Reputation: 34972
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manigault View Post
Comparisons will never be settled. The question is if Republicans acted correctly in the current hearings. It certainly appears that they did not.
Presedence was set though during the Kavanaugh hearings. Once you let something happen with no recourse then it will continue to happen.

You can't just say "forget about it because it's in the past". Do you not understand that ?

Decorum and respect has to be maintained by both sides ALL THE TIME and for all people.

It's hypocrisy and the Dems are whining about it now.
 
Old 04-06-2022, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Southeast US
8,609 posts, read 2,308,762 times
Reputation: 2114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manigault View Post
NJ Senator Corey Booker on Monday stated what was obvious to many observers -- the Republicans on the Judiciary Committee used the hearings as to Judge Jackson more to air grievances than to discuss her qualifications for the appointment. Whining about what happened with Kavanaugh and Barrett is not discussing Jackson.

Notably, he asked: "How qualified must a person be?" No one has creditably stated that Judge Jackson with her training, experience and education is unqualified. What the senators did not state is that Judge Jackson rulings and sentencings had been well inside the norms for judicial action. Remarkably, 70 to 80% of judges go below sentencing guidelines but the Republicans had confirmed Republican judges that did so but now questioned Jackson about her record.

As to the hearing: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...brown-jackson/

He has some good points. The Republicans on the Judiciary Committee should be ashamed of how they conducted themselves during he hearings.
what was the most scintillating question Booker asked her?
 
Old 04-06-2022, 02:00 PM
 
Location: Boston
20,102 posts, read 9,018,880 times
Reputation: 18759
Did anyone ask her if she was a woman?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top