Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-08-2022, 10:21 AM
 
Location: Southeast US
8,609 posts, read 2,309,649 times
Reputation: 2114

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by charolastra00 View Post
Susie has two moms. Johnny has two dads. Jim Bob, whose parents have been derelict in their parental duties, doesn't know why Johnny's dads are holding hands walking him home from school or why Susie's mom's kiss at their daughter's birthday party. Jim Bob asks his teacher because at 5 you think your teacher knows everything. The teacher is not able to answer in an age-appropriate manner that families and love come in lots of different shapes and sizes. Instead, by the Florida law, they would need to say they can't answer that.

What I just can't understand is why you all want to get rid of gendered restrooms. I thought you were upset by trans kids using the bathroom that most makes sense for their appearance, but here you are supporting a law where by the very nature of the law, teachers couldn't explain which restroom to use or enforce gender because they aren't allowed to talk about it.
actually, this isn't true. none of it. Your interpretation - or the interpretation of whatever liberal group you're parroting - of the FL law.

And if Jim Bob's parents' "dereliction" is they're not "loving and supportive and provide for Jim Bob" is one thing. If dereliction is intended to mean "didn't teach a 5 year old that there are gay families", well that is a matter of personal opinion

And anyone that thinks there's a rash of K-3 who are transgendering and have bathroom confusion, it makes me wonder.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-08-2022, 10:25 AM
 
Location: Camberville
15,866 posts, read 21,445,747 times
Reputation: 28211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
I can't speak for others, but when I went to K-12, we didn't know anything about our teacher's sex lives. The most we were privy to was whether the women were Miss, or Mrs, and even that did not inform us of whether they were dating, engaged to be married, were still married or divorced.

Nowadays, these self absorbed, attention seeking narcissists in the K-12 teaching profession, think their students should know even the most intimate parts of their personal sex lives, and be privy to their sexual desires and proclivities. so they post teary-eyed Tik-Tok videos, crying that they might not be able to spew their sex lives in front of grade school students.

That's weird to me. My teachers had photos of their families on their desks. We saw them together at things like the annual Fall Carnival, theater productions, and football games. They talked about their kids or mentioned their spouses. It wasn't like they said "OK kids, gather round and let's talk about ME!" but it's the kind of thing that comes out spending a year in a classroom with another human being. They didn't have to check their wedding rings at the door or quit when they became pregnant, either.

You spend a lot of time fantasizing about teachers' sex lives and the phantom of how they share that in a classroom (in short - they don't). Seek help, it sounds like the pervert is you.

That was in the 90s and early 2000s. My parents, who went to school in a different state in a city (rather than small town) in the 60s, still remember personal details about their teachers. This is nothing new.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2022, 10:29 AM
 
6,617 posts, read 5,012,264 times
Reputation: 3689
Fast forward to the next Marvel movie. Its a new bar to say that story lines that show the existence of LBGT people is grooming. I thought their thing was that they want lbgt characters in stories that dont center on their sexual identity, I thought thats what we all wanted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2022, 10:31 AM
 
Location: Southeast US
8,609 posts, read 2,309,649 times
Reputation: 2114
Quote:
Originally Posted by charolastra00 View Post
Can you point to examples of teachers teaching kindergartners about sex? Because even without this law, that wouldn't be allowed.

What this law bans is the teacher answering questions about why their classmate has two moms. Or from mentioning their spouse. Or answering any questions about their pregnancy. Or guiding students to the appropriate restroom for their gender. Can't talk about sex, after all!

The "omg teaching 5 year olds about SEX" line that has become prominent is so rooted in fear and ignorance that it jumps right over the truth and slides into home base into conspiracy theory.
that you could even type this absurdity is troubling. Yeah, the teacher isn't going to correct little 5 year old Johnny when he goes to wander into the girls restroom.

You people really truly believe this inanity, don't you?

Or is this simply a defense mechanism against the equally-absurd "all teachers are groomers"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2022, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Southeast US
8,609 posts, read 2,309,649 times
Reputation: 2114
Quote:
Originally Posted by xray731 View Post
you used an August '21 article.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2022, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Camberville
15,866 posts, read 21,445,747 times
Reputation: 28211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eyebee Teepee View Post
that you could even type this absurdity is troubling. Yeah, the teacher isn't going to correct little 5 year old Johnny when he goes to wander into the girls restroom.

You people really truly believe this inanity, don't you?

Or is this simply a defense mechanism against the equally-absurd "all teachers are groomers"?

How could they according to the law as it's written?


This law was made without thinking out the logical conclusions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2022, 10:35 AM
 
Location: Southeast US
8,609 posts, read 2,309,649 times
Reputation: 2114
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
So MAGA-hated morons and their dimwitted offspring won't be taking any more trips Disneyland.

Hmmm.

Republicans are continually obsessed by pedophilia. Wonder what that's about.
I think you meant "hatted" not hated, and Disneyland is in California.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2022, 10:37 AM
 
8,181 posts, read 2,793,632 times
Reputation: 6016
Quote:
Originally Posted by charolastra00 View Post
How could they according to the law as it's written?


This law was made without thinking out the logical conclusions.
This law as its written is no more thoughtless than Brandon's "Regulate Everything that Moves and Tax it Until it Dies" ....er I mean Build Back Woke....er I mean Build Back "Better" Agenda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2022, 10:43 AM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,949,172 times
Reputation: 18156
Quote:
Originally Posted by charolastra00 View Post
How could they according to the law as it's written?


This law was made without thinking out the logical conclusions.
The only people that don't understand can't imagine not talking sex with little kids.

Everyone else understands it just fine. The law is logical and makes sense.

If as an ADULT you are freaking out because you feel your SEXUAL FREEDOM is violated when teachers can't talk about sex with 5 year olds...

Seek help. Immediately. It's needed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2022, 10:47 AM
 
Location: Southeast US
8,609 posts, read 2,309,649 times
Reputation: 2114
Quote:
Originally Posted by charolastra00 View Post
How could they according to the law as it's written?


This law was made without thinking out the logical conclusions.
the woke attorneys have been doing a great job of convincing school personnel that the ONLY way to avoid getting sued - which isn't even a parent's first relief - is to remove any mention of any gender. That's the purported "logical conclusion". Though I'm sure they'll have their eyes and ears out for any teacher that dare have a family photo in their room.

That's just absolute BS until the first parent complains to the school about "You're not supposed to teach Johnny pronouns at all!! You cannot say "He ate lunch"!!!! and that parent DOESN'T get laughed at by the system, the magistrate who has to hear it when the parent escalates, and hopefully the stupid right-wing attorney who the dumb parent has to pay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:56 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top