Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
IIRC, back in the olden days we got the birds and bees in 7th grade health class.
That's all the schools should be teaching about, and the seventh grade is an appropriate time to do so.
Quote:
Originally Posted by crone
All this gender Id and pedo stuff is election day posturing.
Really? Democrats are enacting these disgusting curriculums so that Republicans have something to run on?
At least you're admitting that this curriculum has pedophilia-like content in it... I mean, after all, if a stranger started talking to your twelve year old about m*st*rb*tion, you'd call the police, yet, it's okay for a seventh grade teacher in Maryland to do so...
Wise is the person who considers the source. Breitbart is one that deserves every ounce of criticism for it's misguided and inaccurate articles. Half truths and mostly false articles are it's status .
Wise is the person who considers the source. Breitbart is one that deserves every ounce of criticism for it's misguided and inaccurate articles. Half truths and mostly false articles are it's status .
Still, I am on guard about these things. Certain parts of the county I live in have gone off the deep end when it comes to liberal, illegal alien/rainbow stuff. There is an element of truth to the article.
I am grateful that parents are pretty vocal about a lot of these things and very involved with their kids' education. There certainly are a lot of good schools and great teachers too. That must be said.
Wise is the person who considers the source. Breitbart is one that deserves every ounce of criticism for it's misguided and inaccurate articles. Half truths and mostly false articles are it's status .
Wise is the person who considers the source. Breitbart is one that deserves every ounce of criticism for it's misguided and inaccurate articles. Half truths and mostly false articles are it's status .
This is what they say to teach to seventh graders: "Identify solo, vaginal, anal, and oral sex along with possible outcomes of each."
When I was in the seventh grade, just fifteen years ago, I was taught about the anatomy and nothing else. That's all the teachers should teach about.
Would you normally let strangers talk about giving bj's with 13 year old's? Why would this be any different?
"If you can't argue with the content, attack the source"...
Thank you for posting that data. I stand by my posting. Breitbart and perhaps your post can use some reading comprehension and further updating in facts. Weird that the very pages conflict with the insinuation posed.
I read the entire 51 pages.
I understand if people don’t want the schools to be the ones to educate about sex. I get that. That’s a reasonable position, not one I take, but reasonable nonetheless.
I don’t understand the leap between sex Ed or gender identity Ed and grooming.
Grooming for what exactly?
Grooming to think a certain way about tranny’s.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.