Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-09-2022, 10:06 AM
 
Location: The Piedmont of North Carolina
6,016 posts, read 2,838,772 times
Reputation: 7628

Advertisements

https://www.dailywire.com/news/democ...cluding-murder

From the DEMOCRAT-CONTROLLED Committee: "[T]he “perinatal death” language could lead to an unintended and undesirable conclusion. As currently in print, it may not be sufficiently clear that “perinatal death” is intended to be the consequence of a pregnancy complication. Thus, the bill could be interpreted to immunize a pregnant person from all criminal penalties for all pregnancy outcomes, including the death of a newborn for any reason during the “perinatal” period after birth, including a cause of death which is not attributable to pregnancy complications, which clearly is not the author’s intent."

Sorry, don't believe that. If that wasn't the intention, it would have been clearly stated the first time.

From the article: "The analysis says that, while the bill does not define the term “perinatal,” it applies “up to 7 completed days of life.” One provision in California state Welfare and Institutions code states: “‘Perinatal’ means the period from the establishment of pregnancy to one month following delivery.” Yet another portion of state law, not cited by the analysis, extends the term “perinatal” to “60 days following delivery.”

After the committee released its official analysis, Wicks added the “perinatal death due to a pregnancy-related cause” amendment to the legislation. The amended bill passed the Assembly Judiciary Committee Tuesday by a 7-2, party-line vote.
"

What is a pregnancy-related cause? That seems vague. Is it something like, "the woman accidentally got pregnant, and didn't want it"? Isn't that a pregnancy-related cause?

Anyways, it seems Democrats are trying to legalize infanticide for those they determine "can't survive". For an issue that's quite deadly and final, they've left the language quite vague. (On purpose, of course)

It seems you'll be lucky to survive being born in California, and then you can live in Maryland and be groomed for sexual perversions starting at age 3...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:40 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top