Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I just DuckDuckGoed "pushback at LGTB school agenda" and got the opposite of what you claimed.
I'm looking for articles about recent incidents. Not generalized articles from 2018 and 2019.
What's interesting is if you shorten the phrase to 'pushback at LGBTQ' the links are about how teachers can fight against the pushback. With that search, all links are pro-LGTBQ agenda and movement.
You are looking for a minority of content with an indexing engine. Of course it will be low on the results due to the very nature of what a search engine is. Poor choice of key words doesn't help.
You are looking for a minority of content with an indexing engine. Of course it will be low on the results due to the very nature of what a search engine is. Poor choice of key words doesn't help.
I've looked using probably 20-25 different combinations of LGBTQ orientation survey school teachers school districts lawsuits parent outrage parent rights, etc.
These articles are being BURIED. No denying that fact. Stories that I have previously read ..POOF.. have disappeared from the searches. There is an enormous amount of pro LGBTQ, pro sex in the schools, pro transgender information that appears, however.
I've looked using probably 20-25 different combinations of LGBTQ orientation survey school teachers school districts lawsuits parent outrage parent rights, etc.
These articles are being BURIED. No denying that fact. Stories that I have previously read ..POOF.. have disappeared from the searches. There is an enormous amount of pro LGBTQ, pro sex in the schools, pro transgender information that appears, however.
I'll try Brave.
Thanks to those who offered usable suggestions.
That doesn't have anything to do with the search engine but rather the content that is out there to find. You give the answer yourself. There is an enormous amount of pro content. So it will dominate the results.
Status:
"I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out."
(set 4 days ago)
35,614 posts, read 17,948,343 times
Reputation: 50640
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankNSense
And I used Google with the term "Black Lives Matter".
It returned "About 1,140,000,000 results (0.54 seconds)"
You are comparing the top 10.
What is the difference if they "filter" something by not showing it, and moving it to page 3,124 if it doesn't fit the agenda that is being pushed?
Do you have evidence that they are filtering responses by agenda, or are they filtering responses by number of hits? So, just trying to respond to what you're probably looking for? I LOVE that about google - they're typically pretty good at figuring out what I'm trying to find.
That doesn't have anything to do with the search engine but rather the content that is out there to find. You give the answer yourself. There is an enormous amount of pro content. So it will dominate the results.
It shouldn't when negatives are attached and in quotes. But it still does.
And how does lawsuit indicate I'm searching for pro-content?
It also disputes the reasoning that it pulls up what you want to see based on prior searches/viewing habits. It's not giving me any information that I am looking for.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
