Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-04-2022, 03:16 PM
 
4,534 posts, read 4,930,400 times
Reputation: 6327

Advertisements

Solution is easy right? Don't reproduce if you can't afford it. Obviously society is incapable of that, so the easier solution would be to perform vasectomies on males at a young age, right? Vasectomy is reversible, so no harm, no foul. Vasectomies can last until a man can demonstrate they're capable of supporting a kid (or multiple ones). No big difference here between this and the govt controlling women's bodies and decisions. Heck, it lesser of the two evils to snip men, because then you'd prevent life from happening in the first place, which is what this big stink is about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-04-2022, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Free State of Florida
25,737 posts, read 12,815,111 times
Reputation: 19305
the Libs want the women to do all the providing, and for the men to stay home with the kids. Maybe the women should be fixed until they prove they can bring home enough bacon for the family.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2022, 03:26 PM
 
4,621 posts, read 2,223,650 times
Reputation: 3952
Quote:
Originally Posted by fibonacci View Post
Solution is easy right? Don't reproduce if you can't afford it. Obviously society is incapable of that, so the easier solution would be to perform vasectomies on males at a young age, right? Vasectomy is reversible, so no harm, no foul. Vasectomies can last until a man can demonstrate they're capable of supporting a kid (or multiple ones). No big difference here between this and the govt controlling women's bodies and decisions. Heck, it lesser of the two evils to snip men, because then you'd prevent life from happening in the first place, which is what this big stink is about.
So repealing roe v Wade is the same thing as mutilating babies?

You know repealing roe v Wade will have very little effect on abortion right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2022, 03:28 PM
 
Location: San Diego
50,294 posts, read 47,043,365 times
Reputation: 34079
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach43ofus View Post
the Libs want the women to do all the providing, and for the men to stay home with the kids. Maybe the women should be fixed until they prove they can bring home enough bacon for the family.
Why would they do that when big govt will cover what the father would do. $$


We all get to pay for either abortions or raising the kid. Costs? Probably about the same in the end game. Tax payers lose. In the mean time we have millions of illegals scamming the system too so ... pay your taxes suckers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2022, 03:29 PM
 
Location: Florida
10,457 posts, read 4,040,143 times
Reputation: 8481
Wouldn't it be easier to just strap on chastity belts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2022, 03:29 PM
 
Location: Sector 001
15,946 posts, read 12,287,130 times
Reputation: 16109
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach43ofus View Post
the Libs want the women to do all the providing, and for the men to stay home with the kids. Maybe the women should be fixed until they prove they can bring home enough bacon for the family.

The libs want the government to pay for women to live entirely so they can go and enjoy all of what life has to offer with no responsibilities or accountability of any sort.

If we really want to stop population growth, stop giving food to poor countries where people breed like rabbits. Teach people to fish, don't give them fish.

Stop giving handouts and rewarding people FOR having kids out of wedlock. Make them live in the streets and rely on the generosity of others. We wouldn't have so many lonely men out there if women had to date boring "provider" guys rather than relying on the government to pay for their kids while they date the "bad boys" and "fun guys" ... I see it happen all the time.

Should we snip males... an interesting thought. The problem with that is that could be argued to be an authoritarian mandate and a slippery slope towards outright tyranny such as what China has. I'd rather have maximum freedom with maximum responsibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2022, 03:30 PM
 
Location: The Piedmont of North Carolina
6,028 posts, read 2,846,987 times
Reputation: 7650
Should women be sown up until they can provide?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2022, 03:30 PM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,945,609 times
Reputation: 18151
Quote:
Originally Posted by fibonacci View Post
Solution is easy right? Don't reproduce if you can't afford it. Obviously society is incapable of that, so the easier solution would be to perform vasectomies on males at a young age, right? Vasectomy is reversible, so no harm, no foul. Vasectomies can last until a man can demonstrate they're capable of supporting a kid (or multiple ones). No big difference here between this and the govt controlling women's bodies and decisions. Heck, it lesser of the two evils to snip men, because then you'd prevent life from happening in the first place, which is what this big stink is about.
Sure. And then charge each woman $500,000 per child.


Be careful what you wish for. This scenario will work out AWESOME for women.

No one is controlling women's reproductive choices but women.

Use BC and have sex with a man who respects you. Billions of women manage to not get pregnant every day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2022, 03:31 PM
 
Location: Gaston, South Carolina
15,713 posts, read 9,523,000 times
Reputation: 17617
The government should stay out of our bodies, men and women alike.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2022, 03:31 PM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,945,609 times
Reputation: 18151
Isn't it funny that women say yes to unprotected sex ... But it's the man's fault she's pregnant.

So HER decision ... to have unprotected sex ... is the man's ... fault ...

Huh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top