White labor force participation rate is now the lowest of any racial group (unemployed, Mexicans)

[phinneas j. whoopee]

Originally Posted by James Bond 007

Yes it does.


Retired people are already excluded from calculations of LFPR.


No, YOU try again.

How could that be possible when no one can agree on how many there are?

[jdaelectro]

I have no problem with those numbers. There is an epidemic of lazy kids in this country.

I would be interested to see a statistic of what political affiliation there is in the households that are churning out these lazy kids.

Speaking from experiences that I've witnessed: It's overwhelmingly been the liberal household that has a higher instance of children that don't grow up and are coddled till their mid to late 20's. Conservative households on the other hand seem to try to instill some type of hard work ethic.

[Leona Valley]

Originally Posted by phinneas j. whoopee

How could that be possible when no one can agree on how many there are?

He’s 007 and knows exactly how many illegals are in the U.S.

Don’t question 007.

[michiganmoon]

Race driven propaganda.

White people have a higher average age and that reflects in retired who are neither unemployed nor employed.

Only Asians have a lower unemployment rate.

[saltine]

Cheap labor= pass

[James Bond 007]

Originally Posted by SAN_Man

I think this indicates that whites are the most financially secure, so much so, that they're able to not re-enter the labor force and decided to retire. Whites are also the largest share of older Americans, so that makes sense.

The other problem with statements like this is, in many other threads, such as this one where people are attacking good news on jobs creation by complaining about the low LFPR, they conveniently forget arguments such as the one above which says that the LFPR is low because so many Whites have retired.

That is, when you tell them the White LFPR is low, they scream "But that's because they're old and retired!" But elsewhere when you tell them 400K new jobs were added last month, but the LFPR went down, they scream aloud, "But the LFPR went down!"

[Leona Valley]

Originally Posted by jdaelectro

I have no problem with those numbers. There is an epidemic of lazy white kids in this country.

I would be interested to see a statistic of what political affiliation there is in the households that are churning out these lazy kids.

Speaking from experiences that I've witnessed: It's overwhelmingly been the liberal household that has a higher instance of children that don't grow up and are coddled till their mid to late 20's. Conservative households on the other hand seem to try to instill some type of hard work ethic.

Whites have lower unemployment rates than blacks or Hispanics. To suggest white kids are the laziest doesn’t jibe with those rates.

[Leona Valley]

Originally Posted by jdaelectro

I edited my post to just say lazy kids. You were too quick though

Sorry. I’ll try to slow it down a bit next time. :-)

[michiganmoon]

Originally Posted by James Bond 007

The other problem with statements like this is, in many other threads, such as this one where people are attacking good news on jobs creation by complaining about the low LFPR, they conveniently forget arguments such as the one above which says that the LFPR is low because so many Whites have retired.

That is, when you tell them the White LFPR is low, they scream "But that's because they're old and retired!" But elsewhere when you tell them 400K new jobs were added last month, but the LFPR went down, they scream aloud, "But the LFPR went down!"

You are diverting from being caught manipulating data to push racial propaganda.

Originally Posted by Leona Valley

Whites have lower unemployment rates than blacks or Hispanics. To suggest white kids are the laziest doesn’t jibe with those rates.

Yes. It is not whites that make up 14% of the population but 39% of welfare takers.

[texan2yankee]

older whites are the largest population in america, so this statistic doesn't surprise me. they have retired before 65. I did, too.