Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Carrying guns on FEDERAL property is a felony
And the Secret Service ignored that because of Trump
And that is why NONE of the officers used their weapons against the mob =—=
Because they knew there were weapons arrayed against them and didn’t want to start a blood bath
It could have been MUCH worse—
Maybe in a weird way that would have proved the truth of Trump’s intent
That he didn’t care how much violence it took to disrupt the election certification and let him remain president
Cause it didn’t work
He threw the dice and crapped out
I have no idea what are you saying? they did not use their weapons against the mob because of Trump. Why??? You said it is because they did not want to start a blood bath. So, is it because of Trump or because POTUS was there or because no one wants the Tiananmen Square in DC.
Nobody claims Biden corruption starts and ends with Hunter.
Look for a select committee to examine Biden (especially the Big Guy) corruption in November. And the Libs will howl with faux outrage when the new Speaker of the House hand-selects each and every member of the committee. Nancy style.
I think they voted on articles of impeachment 3 times but only passed them twice. One ‘trial’ was when he was in office and one was shortly after he left office. These committee hearing are a year and a half after he left office and are separate and apart from the three previous (failing) efforts.
Not saying the Left and their stenographers in the press are obsessed or anything.
3 times ??? I remember only 2 times, Jan 6th and Ukraine aids.
Doesn’t Pelosi’s hand-picked committee decide who testifies and what portion of testimony is released and what questions are asked.
Not saying she might be partisan but she is, after all, one of the major culprits in the Trump Russia Collusion Hoax.
Neither Nancy Pelosi nor any member of the Committee is telling any witness what to say under oath. If you have evidence to the contrary, bring it.
What the Committee is doing is asking pertinent questions based on previous testimony they have heard and presenting the mountain of evidence in a way that even those with limited education can understand. if you were on the Committee you would handle business the same way.
Nearly 1,000 witnesses have produced over 130,000 pages of transcripts of their testimony. You surely are smart enough to know that all of it cannot be presented on television.
I have no idea what are you saying? they did not use their weapons against the mob because of Trump. Why??? You said it is because they did not want to start a blood bath. So, is it because of Trump or because POTUS was there or because no one wants the Tiananmen Square in DC.
Please smack yourself as many times as you wish
Does that help?
You know the President did not go with his mob to assault democracy in action
My interpretation was that although the LEOs guarding the Capitol had weapons they were not used on the crowd—
It was a SS agent who fired the only weapon at the mob and that resulted in death of one trying to gain illegal entry into the House chamber
Deservedly so IMO
Originally Posted by Quick Commenter View Post
Doesn’t Pelosi’s hand-picked committee decide who testifies and what portion of testimony is released and what questions are asked.
Not saying she might be partisan but she is, after all, one of the major culprits in the Trump Russia Collusion Hoax.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald
Neither Nancy Pelosi nor any member of the Committee is telling any witness what to say under oath. If you have evidence to the contrary, bring it.
What the Committee is doing is asking pertinent questions based on previous testimony they have heard and presenting the mountain of evidence in a way that even those with limited education can understand. if you were on the Committee you would handle business the same way.
Nearly 1,000 witnesses have produced over 130,000 pages of transcripts of their testimony. You surely are smart enough to know that all of it cannot be presented on television.
You are correct that Nancy’s hand-picked committee has not confessed to telling any witnesses what to say under oath. I made no such suggestion (we call that a diversion-fail).
At the same time Nancy’s hand-picked committee have been quite adamant that THEY are the sole deciders of who gets interviewed, what questions are asked, what transcripts are released, who is shown on TV, etc.
At this point they have superbly demonstrated, unabashedly, this is a one-sided committee.
And the libs (and their media) will be howling in outrage (!) when the new Republican speaker sets up a theatrical performance/select committee along those lines in November. Maybe several. And you’ll have Nancy’s precedent to thank.
Last edited by Quick Commenter; 07-01-2022 at 10:47 AM..
I guess Democrats have to go to plan Y. The hearings are not working. LOL.
Better start looking for new witnesses.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
