Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Another impartial juror. People, Companies and governments get subpoena all the time. This is how people put meals on their tables and make a living. You been saying this about Trump since the Russian hoax. Wishful thinking.
I don’t recall Trump being mentioned in that post as having received a subpoena. Are you saying the subpoenas for Giuliani, Graham, et al somehow connect Trump to election tampering in Georgia…?
I don’t recall Trump being mentioned in that post. Are you saying the subpoenas for Giuliani, Graham, et al somehow connect Trump to election tampering in Georgia…?
I have no idea since it's kept confidential like it should be. I put with a grain of salt leaks. My point one more time is: just because people, companies and government officials get subpoena for whatever investigation doesn't mean guilt or a crime has been committed or a trial will come out of it.
Another impartial juror. The best you can determine? How? if you don't have all the facts, only a trial can bring all the facts, why would you determine something with part of information or misinformation?
How?
She isn’t working there. She left when Biden came in because she was a Trump loyalist and not suitable to work for Democrats. Do you have any evidence she was kept on by Uncle Joe?
She isn’t working there. She left when Biden came in because she was a Trump loyalist and not suitable to work for Democrats. Do you have any evidence she was kept on by Uncle Joe?
She said she was a Trump loyalist? I missed that part in her hearsay testimony. Does it matter, it doesn't prove anything about her hearsay testimony. She wouldn't make it to the stand in a trial.
I have no idea since it's kept confidential like it should be. I put with a grain of salt leaks. My point one more time is: just because people, companies and government officials get subpoena for whatever investigation doesn't mean guilt or a crime has been committed or a trial will come out of it.
But since you are an impartial juror, you get it.
The Georgia Secretary of State and his COO both testified under oath about the phone calls from Trump and Graham trying to change the results of the election. Did you miss that hearing?
She said she was a Trump loyalist? I missed that part in her hearsay testimony. Does it matter, it doesn't prove anything about her hearsay testimony. She wouldn't make it to the stand in a trial.
What she said during her testimony was that she thought Trump’s policies had been good for the country, but that things went on she couldn’t tolerate. She also said she’d vote for him again.
If you had watched or read the transcript instead of Trump’s garbage over at Truth Social you’d know that.
The Georgia Secretary of State and his COO both testified under oath about the phone calls from Trump and Graham trying to change the results of the election. Did you miss that hearing?
What's the crime? Why hasn't GA Justice Department or U.S. DOJ filed charges. If We have a real trial We can see all the evidence and intent. So what's the hold up? or both DOJ's are waiting on Pelosi's Kangaroo hearing recommendations to act? Is that the plan?
Another impartial juror. The best you can determine? How? if you don't have all the facts, only a trial can bring all the facts, why would you determine something with part of information or misinformation?
Sorry that you are seeing this as a trial. Therein lays your first error in adult rationale thinking. It's a hearing.
For the rest of us, the how is easy . We research thru various media sources. None have parlayed she worked in any paid capacity at The Florida residency after leaving the west wing.
Maybe if you have her paystubs showing she worked there you can hand it over to your local news paper. Just an idea if you support transparency and not some conspiracy that the election was stolen.
Wondering if those who are demanding a trial to "get all the facts" have contacted DOJ.
No time like the present to send them a message demanding a trial.
Isn't the burden of proof on the government? or Pelosi's Kangaroo court is the final verdict?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
