Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Neither do many posters on this board....because I for one have absolutely no clue what you are talking about. This is complete gibberish. Direct Testimony....under oath....form cooperating members of Trumps Inner Circle, Administration officials and prominent GOP elections officials is not biased. This is in their own words....and they had the right to plead the 5th.
You are an impartial juror, you. Of course you refuse to see any other narrative other than yours. So you have evidence that Trump gave an order to a group of protesters to violently attack the Capitol to overthrow the government? that's the story you are stinking to right? ok
one more time, the hearing is BIAS. The people running the hearing are bias. They show their narrative and hide others. Do you know what is a Kangaroo Court? you do but you are so bias that TDS blinds you.
So you have evidence that Trump gave an order to a group of protesters to violently attack the Capitol to overthrow the government? that's the story you are stinking to right? ok
There has been unrefuted sworn testimony trump was informed the crowd was armed and video of him directing them to the Capitol
You are an impartial juror, you. Of course you refuse to see any other narrative other than yours. So you have evidence that Trump gave an order to a group of protesters to violently attack the Capitol to overthrow the government? that's the story you are stinking to right? ok
I am listening to....Trumps Inner Circle, Administration officials and prominent GOP election officials in their own words under oath. This is their side of the story. I believe their statements.
So you have evidence that Trump gave an order to a group of protesters to violently attack the Capitol to overthrow the government? that's the story you are stinking to right? ok
The last hearing included one of Trump's followers who said just that. He came to Washinton to follow Trump's orders. When Trump told the rally participant to match down to the Capitol, he did so.
I guess you missed all the information about the white house planning session for the attack on the Capitol in December.
Yes, it was all pre-planned and Trump's lackeys followed his lead on the ellipse that day.
You can always tell when a particular hearing has been especially powerful. It brings out 45's sycophants to try anything to derail the topic. Sworn witness testimony under oath, by those who were right there as meetings and events went down, is utterly triggering for those most dug-in. They can neither stand to watch it nor turn away.
What the witnesses said, was for political purposes or criminal? Let me say it again, Trump was already impeached and acquitted over the matter. He is a private citizen. Anything new that wasn't covered in the impeachment trial that is not political has to be impartially investigated by the DOJ away from the politics of Pelosi and Congress who have a long history of bias and conflict of interest.
I don't know how many times I have to explain.
This is nonsensical.
The testimony under oath from a Republican attorney general, White House counsel, DOJ lawyers, state legislators , state election officials ALL REPUBLICANS should be discounted because the Democrats are asking the questions?
The last hearing included one of Trump's followers who said just that. He came to Washinton to follow Trump's orders. When Trump told the rally participant to match down to the Capitol, he did so.
I guess you missed all the information about the white house planning session for the attack on the Capitol in December.
Yes, it was all pre-planned and Trump's lackeys followed his lead on the ellipse that day.
You mean when Trump told them to protest peacefully on video and in public and Pelosis' Kangaroo court cuts that out from the presentation? OK.
Yeah, all that’s nice, but what kind of proof do you have…?
Lets not forget all the iterations of his speech on J6. With his notes, and then a recording of the final speech.
With each iteration getting more violent and more angry. All in the national archives.
Not that anyone would believe those documents.
"We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore," he said.
They rigged it like they've never rigged an election before. (of course he knew this was a lie)
All of us here today do not want to see our election victory stolen by emboldened radical-left Democrats, which is what they're doing. And stolen by the fake news media. That's what they've done and what they're doing. We will never give up, we will never concede. It doesn't happen. You don't concede when there's theft involved. Our country has had enough. We will not take it anymore and that's what this is all about.
If we allow this group of people to illegally take over our country because it's illegal when the votes are illegal when the way they got there is illegal when the states that vote are given false and fraudulent information.
Last edited by foodyum; 07-13-2022 at 03:28 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
