U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Will you be watching the House January 6 Committee hearing?
YES-WATCHING 70 24.56%
NO-NOT WATCHING 215 75.44%
Voters: 285. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 06-07-2022, 05:54 PM
 
Location: Louisiana
8,706 posts, read 5,245,615 times
Reputation: 7251

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
It's amazing how many posters have been screaming for "PROOF!" for months, and now apparently do not want to see it in the form of source documents and first hand, eyewitness accounts when it's offered.
We'll still be screaming for proof, since it sure isn't coming out of this production.
Do you think we'll find out why they refused the guardsmen that Trump authorized?
Do you think we'll hear about FBI agents and informants in the crowd, perhaps leading it?
Rate this post positively

 
Old 06-07-2022, 06:06 PM
 
23,582 posts, read 12,627,511 times
Reputation: 9834
Quote:
Originally Posted by naicha View Post
Probably not.

Bangazi, Russia collusion.
They all the same circle show of shouting old people twisting facts or cherry picking.

Never trying to find the truth of what went down, ..only trying to nab gotcha points and sling blame.
Yes, this here Folks is all it amounts to......with OUR money.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 06-07-2022, 06:07 PM
 
Location: Planet Earth
8,454 posts, read 9,483,240 times
Reputation: 6318
No I'd rather watch grass grow
Rate this post positively
 
Old 06-07-2022, 06:08 PM
 
23,582 posts, read 12,627,511 times
Reputation: 9834
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowne View Post
I well recall that skit.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 06-07-2022, 06:09 PM
 
Location: Sector 001
14,279 posts, read 10,263,622 times
Reputation: 14359
Literally NO ONE gives a **** about Jan 6th except for lunatic leftist Democrats and RINOs.

The corrupt liberal DOJ/FBI set up people and encouraged them to enter restricted areas and then imprisoned them for it.

All Jan 6th does is show people how corrupt the DOJ/FBI is.

The swamp focuses on everything except for what the American people wants them to focus on. TERM LIMITS.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 06-07-2022, 06:20 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
29,186 posts, read 14,427,542 times
Reputation: 11689
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speleothem View Post
We'll still be screaming for proof, since it sure isn't coming out of this production.
Do you think we'll find out why they refused the guardsmen that Trump authorized?
Do you think we'll hear about FBI agents and informants in the crowd, perhaps leading it?
If you are going to watch it to see what they have, I wasn't talking to you. They just might completely exonerate Trump and everyone around him. This could be like Geraldo Rivera opening Capone's safe and finding nothing.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 06-07-2022, 06:26 PM
 
Location: Southern Nevada
5,795 posts, read 2,526,561 times
Reputation: 8668
Unless Pelosi can answer the question of why she didn't take President Trump's offer of putting National Guard troops at the Capitol Building in the days leading up to Jan. 6th then I have no interest in watching this partisan Democrat clown show.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 06-07-2022, 08:55 PM
 
33,597 posts, read 17,598,872 times
Reputation: 16571
Default Secret service testifies about Trump to the committee.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/0...ttack-00037748

For some reason I thought the secret service could not be made to discuss these things, but I learned that they were forced to testify in things involving the Clintons by the GOP. So it looks like thats going to come back and bite them. But I sort of agree that secret service agents should not be shielded from this sort of thing.

Anyone else shared my mistaken belief that the secret service was immune?
Rate this post positively
 
Old 06-07-2022, 08:57 PM
 
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
12,259 posts, read 6,366,781 times
Reputation: 20849
Me. I shared that belief.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 06-07-2022, 09:04 PM
 
28,689 posts, read 12,259,589 times
Reputation: 44133
Hm. I agree with you both.

I thought the Secret Service was there to protect, and were expected to keep the stuff they saw confidential.

When the Bush twins were in Austin at Chuy's Restaurant in their infamous stint of trying to order alcohol as teenagers, the secret service did nothing to stop them from that. They're not babysitters, they said.

Also, secret service has stood outside bedrooms of numerous presidents and kept their mouths shut about affairs.

I agree that SS members should be allowed confidentiality rights.
Rate this post positively
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2022, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top