Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's amazing how many posters have been screaming for "PROOF!" for months, and now apparently do not want to see it in the form of source documents and first hand, eyewitness accounts when it's offered.
We'll still be screaming for proof, since it sure isn't coming out of this production.
Do you think we'll find out why they refused the guardsmen that Trump authorized?
Do you think we'll hear about FBI agents and informants in the crowd, perhaps leading it?
We'll still be screaming for proof, since it sure isn't coming out of this production.
Do you think we'll find out why they refused the guardsmen that Trump authorized?
Do you think we'll hear about FBI agents and informants in the crowd, perhaps leading it?
If you are going to watch it to see what they have, I wasn't talking to you. They just might completely exonerate Trump and everyone around him. This could be like Geraldo Rivera opening Capone's safe and finding nothing.
Unless Pelosi can answer the question of why she didn't take President Trump's offer of putting National Guard troops at the Capitol Building in the days leading up to Jan. 6th then I have no interest in watching this partisan Democrat clown show.
For some reason I thought the secret service could not be made to discuss these things, but I learned that they were forced to testify in things involving the Clintons by the GOP. So it looks like thats going to come back and bite them. But I sort of agree that secret service agents should not be shielded from this sort of thing.
Anyone else shared my mistaken belief that the secret service was immune?
Status:
"I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out."
(set 7 days ago)
35,629 posts, read 17,961,729 times
Reputation: 50652
Hm. I agree with you both.
I thought the Secret Service was there to protect, and were expected to keep the stuff they saw confidential.
When the Bush twins were in Austin at Chuy's Restaurant in their infamous stint of trying to order alcohol as teenagers, the secret service did nothing to stop them from that. They're not babysitters, they said.
Also, secret service has stood outside bedrooms of numerous presidents and kept their mouths shut about affairs.
I agree that SS members should be allowed confidentiality rights.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Secret service testifies about Trump to the committee.
