Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Nobody is questioning the fact that Pelosi's hand-picked and one-sided committee has decided what witnesses to call, has decided what witnesses to interview, has decided what questions to ask, and has decided what witnesses to present for re-questioning live.
(It is also true many/most witnesses have been Republicans.)
I must have missed the potential White House witnesses going on fox and newsmax demanding to give contradictory testimony.
You must have seen them. What are their names?
Nope. Nancy was foolish enough to hand-pick her own select committee and the Left will have her to thank when we see Leader McCarthy hand-pick a select committee on Biden Corruption (including some nice laptop photos and excerpts )
It is called precedent. And the Left will rue it in just a few short months.
(Nancy COULD have taken McCarthy's picks but, you know....)
No actually Pelosi only refused to sit house members who appeared to have participated in the false electors scheme
I must have missed the potential White House witnesses going on fox and newsmax demanding to give contradictory testimony.
You must have seen them. What are their names?
Surprisingly, not a lot of folks want to appear before Nancy's hand=picked and one-sided committee.
But, I think Nancy is someone that McCarthy's picks would have wanted to see in front of a non hand-picked select committee. Her full name is Nancy Pelosi.
McCarty had 3 picks on the comittee with an offer for two more to replace those that had been ( understandably IMO ) rejected. not only did McCarty not submit two new candidaes, he pulled the three already accepted.
so, yes, McCarthy directly had a hand in it. even trump is mow calling that decision "foolish".
No actually Pelosi only refused to sit house members who appeared to have participated in the false electors scheme
Unprecedented. Pelosi selected Adam Schiff who has a history of being a Trump hater and a liar but she VETO 2 of the Republican side because they will challenge Pelosi's narrative and focus why Congress was so poorly prepared before 1/6 making Nancy look really bad.
Like the WSJ editorial said: Unprecedented and they don't blame the GOP for walking out. It was rigged from the beginning.
Unprecedented. Pelosi selected Adam Schiff who has a history of being a Trump hater and a liar but she VETO 2 of the Republican side because they will challenge Pelosi's narrative and focus why Congress was so poorly prepared before 1/6 making Nancy look really bad.
Like the WSJ editorial said: Unprecedented and they don't blame the GOP for walking out. It was rigged from the beginning.
This way Nancy could ensure that the committee wouldn't even discuss calling her (or even have a vote on it).
This way Nancy could ensure that the committee wouldn't even discuss calling her (or even have a vote on it).
yeap! WSJ editorial called her out. Nancy only wanted people in the committee that agreed with her narrative and keep out anybody that had a different narrative or would make her look bad.
How can she select Adam Schiff who is a big Trump hater and a liar but vetoes 2 in the Republican side because they said they wanted to focus why Congress security was so poorly prepared and she didn't want to look bad. This was rigged from the beginning.
After all this is a congressional oversight hearing over 1/6 not a Pelosi's criminal investigation of Trump (wink, wink)
yeap! WSJ editorial called her out. Nancy only wanted people in the committee that agreed with her narrative and keep out anybody that had a different narrative or would make her look bad.
How can she select Adam Schiff who is a big Trump hater and a liar but vetoes 2 in the Republican side because they said they wanted to focus why Congress security was so poorly prepared and she didn't want to look bad. This was rigged from the beginning.
After all this is a congressional oversight hearing over 1/6 not a Pelosi's criminal investigation of Trump (wink, wink)
The only problem is that Nancy is the Speaker of the House and she acted within her purview, the same purview a Republican Speaker of the House would have....in other words...them's the rules. Deal with it. It's the GOP that shot themselves in the foot here. Ask Donald Trump.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
)