Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Will you be watching the House January 6 Committee hearing?
YES-WATCHING 70 24.56%
NO-NOT WATCHING 215 75.44%
Voters: 285. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 06-07-2022, 09:05 PM
 
Location: North of Canada, but not the Arctic
21,074 posts, read 19,579,298 times
Reputation: 25563

Advertisements

Probably every President shared that belief. From now on, they'd be stupid to have Secret Service present when important matters are discussed.

 
Old 06-07-2022, 09:12 PM
 
6,008 posts, read 3,263,833 times
Reputation: 10808
The Democrats really, really don’t want Trump to run in 2024. They are terrified that he will win.

So they are willing to destroy anything to make that happen, including the relationship between the Secret Service and future Presidents.
 
Old 06-07-2022, 09:17 PM
 
Location: Jacksonville, FL
11,120 posts, read 10,668,910 times
Reputation: 9765
Quote:
Originally Posted by WK91 View Post
The Democrats really, really don’t want Trump to run in 2024. They are terrified that he will win.

So they are willing to destroy anything to make that happen, including the relationship between the Secret Service and future Presidents.
Modern Democrats aren’t known for having a great relationship with SS agents. Biden apparently dislikes the Secret Service so much that his dog bit them.
 
Old 06-07-2022, 09:20 PM
 
34,274 posts, read 19,309,765 times
Reputation: 17256
Quote:
Originally Posted by WK91 View Post
The Democrats really, really don’t want Trump to run in 2024. They are terrified that he will win.

So they are willing to destroy anything to make that happen, including the relationship between the Secret Service and future Presidents.
re-read my post. The secret service were made to testify about the Clintons by the GOP originally. The GOP changed this. Its good to see how offended you are by what the GOP has done.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...22-1998-599428
 
Old 06-07-2022, 09:32 PM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,176 posts, read 12,303,428 times
Reputation: 10309
The committee must not have gotten the kind of dirt that they'd been hoping for, otherwise they would have leaked a tease about it, too.
 
Old 06-07-2022, 10:39 PM
 
Location: Louisiana
9,134 posts, read 5,783,022 times
Reputation: 7697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camaro5 View Post
Unless Pelosi can answer the question of why she didn't take President Trump's offer of putting National Guard troops at the Capitol Building in the days leading up to Jan. 6th then I have no interest in watching this partisan Democrat clown show.
Those questions might have been asked if any actual Republicans were allowed on the committee.
Ten thousand National Guardsmen would have prevented the whole thing.
Trump authorized up to twenty thousand.
I think Pelosi wanted it to happen. They are milking it to the extreme.
Aack, they nearly overthrew the United States government.
 
Old 06-07-2022, 11:11 PM
 
34,274 posts, read 19,309,765 times
Reputation: 17256
Default Eastmen ordered to hand over more emails to jan 6th committee as judge says theres evidence of a crime.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/0...ittee-00037999

Story has a link to the ruling:
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000...1-f9c47cc00000

from the ruling:
Quote:
This email cemented the direction of the January 6 plan. The Trump legal team chose not to seek recourse in court—instead, they forged ahead with a political campaign to disrupt the electoral count.
Lawyers are free not to bring cases; they are not free to evade judicial review to overturn a
democratic election. Accordingly, this portion of the emailis subject to the crime-fraud
exception and must be disclosed.


Looks like the committee is getting even more evidence of criminal activity.
 
Old 06-07-2022, 11:54 PM
 
34,274 posts, read 19,309,765 times
Reputation: 17256
Keep in mind folks, this is not a repeat. This is a new email with evidence of crime. And please folks, stay on topic here.
 
Old 06-08-2022, 12:46 AM
 
4,344 posts, read 5,784,490 times
Reputation: 2465
Not sure if I will or not. After hearing Brandon Straka and what the DOJ did to him, I don't know how much I could trust it.
 
Old 06-08-2022, 01:27 AM
 
34,274 posts, read 19,309,765 times
Reputation: 17256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speleothem View Post
Those questions might have been asked if any actual Republicans were allowed on the committee.
Ten thousand National Guardsmen would have prevented the whole thing.
Trump authorized up to twenty thousand.
I think Pelosi wanted it to happen. They are milking it to the extreme.
Aack, they nearly overthrew the United States government.
2 of them are. there were 3 more before mccarthy pulled them. 2 were rejected as theyre involved in it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:56 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top