Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,375 posts, read 12,443,168 times
Reputation: 10391
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald
He was White House Counsel. He knows things.
So? This^ does not answer my question, which was asked of another and not you. If you're going to take it upon yourself to answer for others, then you might want to first follow the discussion, eh?
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,375 posts, read 12,443,168 times
Reputation: 10391
Quote:
Originally Posted by berdee
Where did the story say his legal team was going to testify? Seems like his legal team was asking questions not answering them. Seems that you're making things up, again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald
My apologies. I should have been more specific.
Trump's legal team is there trying to protect the private conversations between Trump and his circle from being entered into testimony under the blanket of Executive Privilege and Attorney-Client Privilege, since Cipollone and Pence's aides have been subpoenaed to testify, and they are approaching the top of the food chain. They would have been in the room when a lot of conversations happened.
The problem for them is that the DOJ is a part of the Executive Branch which is investigating crimes by members of the Executive Branch. The DOJ can compel the testimony. That much is a given.
At question is whether Executive Privilege or Attorney-Client Privilege will protect conversations if the parties were involved in criminal activity. Most legal opinions I have seen say it will not. We'll see. The fact that they are talking to the DOJ means that they and Trump are preparing for him to be indicted and are trying to avoid having to plead the Fifth.
Yes, you should have been, but it seems you still cannot do that. I asked a question and you're tapdancing away from it as hard as you can. I guess I'll have to answer for you...the story does not say "Trump's legal team is going to testify", as you had stated, it does not even hint at it.
In other words no proof, and we’ve been giving it 6 years time.
I didn't say there was no proof. The January 6th committee aren't the ones that would file a case. That would be the DOJ. Again, patience, Grasshopper.
There has actually been quite a bit of evidence revealed. Now, whether anything is done with it remains to be seen.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
