Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
To summarize - Iraq has three times the oil previously estimated sitting below its land. More oil than even Saudi Arabia.
My reaction - Why doesn't the US just start taking this oil to both 1) pay back all debts and costs incurred from the Iraq war, and 2) use domestically? I won't claim to be a foreign relations nor economic guru, however, I feel like now more than ever before the US can justify such action. What are the real pros and cons as well as best and worst case scenarios for the US doing this? What is a good strategy for the US government to make such actions "palatable" internationally?
To summarize - Iraq has three times the oil previously estimated sitting below its land. More oil than even Saudi Arabia.
My reaction - Why doesn't the US just start taking this oil to both 1) pay back all debts and costs incurred from the Iraq war, and 2) use domestically? I won't claim to be a foreign relations nor economic guru, however, I feel like now more than ever before the US can justify such action. What are the real pros and cons as well as best and worst case scenarios for the US doing this? What is a good strategy for the US government to make such actions "palatable" internationally?
To summarize - Iraq has three times the oil previously estimated sitting below its land. More oil than even Saudi Arabia.
My reaction - Why doesn't the US just start taking this oil to both 1) pay back all debts and costs incurred from the Iraq war, and 2) use domestically? I won't claim to be a foreign relations nor economic guru, however, I feel like now more than ever before the US can justify such action. What are the real pros and cons as well as best and worst case scenarios for the US doing this? What is a good strategy for the US government to make such actions "palatable" internationally?
So, the U.S. government should in effect steal this oil to pay for the costs it incurred in killing Iraqis?
Doing so would COMPLETELY justify my assertion that the only thing the state is capable of doing effectively is killing people and stealing things.
Funny how we go there on a wild goose chase, kill hundreds of thousands of them, embolden terrorists to come there and reak havoc, destroy their country's infrastructure and then some expect to be reimbursed?
Machiavelli would say, "Yes! Finally this war could have done us some good!" Because without the oil, this war obviously only hurt U.S. interest. (Realist thought)
But then, of course, you have to tell the 26 million people (minus 1 million and counting -- deaths from the result of war) that it's now undeniable we lied the entire time (they already think that though, you know, from when we instituted the Food for Oil program 2 weeks after we went in... oh yeah, and their lives are a living hell.)
But, I'm almost fine with it. It's not as though we have much integrity left. Britain has only been taking advantage of the Middle East since 1890 and the U.S. since 1953, so what the hell, right?
Why doesn't the US just start taking this oil to both 1) pay back all debts and costs incurred from the Iraq war, and 2) use domestically?
1)I believe there was an amendment proposed to the Iraq funding bill (I don't recall the name... even though it was being worked on yesterday) that called for Iraq beginning to help fund the war. It was defeated.
Truth be told, Americans don't pay attention. The Dems, who you'd expect to be on board with something like that, can defeat it and claim that we're throwing money at Iraq because no one really knows what happens in Congress... I mean... it's only televised on CSPAN.
Over the past two weeks, I've probably seen three or four Senators speaking on that subject. At this point though, if it's a funding issue, call your Congress people and ask why.
You have three representatives in Congress. Two are in the Senate and they are voted by your entire state. One is in the House and that person is voted in by your district.
To contact your Senators, go to U.S. Senate. In the top right you enter your state to get their contact info.
You can also see what else, besides the war, they've been spending your money on at Citizens Against Government Waste: Homepage (http://www.cagw.org/site/PageServer - broken link)
Regarding question 2)It's not our oil. It's theirs. The U.S. went in for any number of reasons... which ones are fact or fable? I don't know. However, on no level I'm aware of did Bush send in the military to exploit the people of Iraq.
But then, of course, you have to tell the 26 million people (minus 1 million and counting -- deaths from the result of war) that it's now undeniable we lied the entire time (they already think that though, you know, from when we instituted the Food for Oil program 2 weeks after we went in... oh yeah, and their lives are a living hell.)
I know its hard, but please attempt to post accurate data. We have not killed 1,000,000 people in Iraq.. please..
To summarize - Iraq has three times the oil previously estimated sitting below its land. More oil than even Saudi Arabia.
This assertion is relatively speculative on Moore's part, unless he has pretty recent and new information. See the page for Iraq at the U.S. Dept. of Energy's Energy Information Agency (EIA) web site. (That page's content has been changed, to offer LESS information, at least a couple of times during Dubya's Administration -- I've been watching it. It used to say that only about 25% of Iraq's territory has been surveyed geologically for oil deposits. So, granted, there is some big upside to their so-called 'proven' reserves.)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.